Re: [PATCH 1/2] iio: hrtimer-trigger: Mark hrtimer to expire in hard interrupt context

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-09-21T12:27:32Z

On 2020-09-21 10:57:03 [+0100], Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> So looking at this the other way, are there any significant risks associated
> with this change? If not I'm tempted to queue them up and we have the rcX
> time to fix anything we've missed (just like every other patch!)

I've been told that it only performs IRQ-thread wake-ups in hard-IRQ
context. This is fine then.

Looking at the other series where ->try_renable() got renamed. It still
looks like bmc150_accel_trig_try_reen() may acquire a mutex. Is it still
the case or do I miss something essential?

> Jonathan

Sebastian