From: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Mudit Sharma" <muditsharma.info@gmail.com>,
"Julien Stephan" <jstephan@baylibre.com>,
"Mariel Tinaco" <Mariel.Tinaco@analog.com>,
"Angelo Dureghello" <adureghello@baylibre.com>,
"Gustavo Silva" <gustavograzs@gmail.com>,
"Nuno Sa" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"João Paulo Gonçalves" <joao.goncalves@toradex.com>,
"ChiYuan Huang" <cy_huang@richtek.com>,
"Ramona Alexandra Nechita" <ramona.nechita@analog.com>,
"Trevor Gamblin" <tgamblin@baylibre.com>,
"Guillaume Stols" <gstols@baylibre.com>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Cosmin Tanislav" <demonsingur@gmail.com>,
"Marcelo Schmitt" <marcelo.schmitt@analog.com>,
"Gwendal Grignou" <gwendal@chromium.org>,
"Antoni Pokusinski" <apokusinski01@gmail.com>,
"Tomasz Duszynski" <tomasz.duszynski@octakon.com>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/27] iio: adc: max1363: Stop using iio_device_claim_direct_scoped()
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 10:51:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ea8021c7a68cad5211ac48dff84920e58152d30.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250209180624.701140-17-jic23@kernel.org>
On Sun, 2025-02-09 at 18:06 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
>
> This complex cleanup.h use case of conditional guards has proved
> to be more trouble that it is worth in terms of false positive compiler
> warnings and hard to read code.
>
> Move directly to the new claim/release_direct() that allow sparse
> to check for unbalanced context.
>
> Reviewed-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> drivers/iio/adc/max1363.c | 165 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/max1363.c b/drivers/iio/adc/max1363.c
> index e8d731bc34e0..35717ec082ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/max1363.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/max1363.c
> @@ -364,55 +364,52 @@ static int max1363_read_single_chan(struct iio_dev
> *indio_dev,
> int *val,
> long m)
> {
> - iio_device_claim_direct_scoped(return -EBUSY, indio_dev) {
> - s32 data;
> - u8 rxbuf[2];
> - struct max1363_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> - struct i2c_client *client = st->client;
> -
> - guard(mutex)(&st->lock);
> -
> - /*
> - * If monitor mode is enabled, the method for reading a
> single
> - * channel will have to be rather different and has not yet
> - * been implemented.
> - *
> - * Also, cannot read directly if buffered capture enabled.
> - */
> - if (st->monitor_on)
> - return -EBUSY;
> + s32 data;
> + u8 rxbuf[2];
> + struct max1363_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + struct i2c_client *client = st->client;
>
> - /* Check to see if current scan mode is correct */
> - if (st->current_mode != &max1363_mode_table[chan->address]) {
> - int ret;
> + guard(mutex)(&st->lock);
>
> - /* Update scan mode if needed */
> - st->current_mode = &max1363_mode_table[chan-
> >address];
> - ret = max1363_set_scan_mode(st);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> - }
> - if (st->chip_info->bits != 8) {
> - /* Get reading */
> - data = st->recv(client, rxbuf, 2);
> - if (data < 0)
> - return data;
> -
> - data = get_unaligned_be16(rxbuf) &
> - ((1 << st->chip_info->bits) - 1);
> - } else {
> - /* Get reading */
> - data = st->recv(client, rxbuf, 1);
> - if (data < 0)
> - return data;
> -
> - data = rxbuf[0];
> - }
> - *val = data;
> + /*
> + * If monitor mode is enabled, the method for reading a single
> + * channel will have to be rather different and has not yet
> + * been implemented.
> + *
> + * Also, cannot read directly if buffered capture enabled.
> + */
> + if (st->monitor_on)
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + /* Check to see if current scan mode is correct */
> + if (st->current_mode != &max1363_mode_table[chan->address]) {
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Update scan mode if needed */
> + st->current_mode = &max1363_mode_table[chan->address];
> + ret = max1363_set_scan_mode(st);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + }
> + if (st->chip_info->bits != 8) {
> + /* Get reading */
> + data = st->recv(client, rxbuf, 2);
> + if (data < 0)
> + return data;
> +
> + data = get_unaligned_be16(rxbuf) &
> + ((1 << st->chip_info->bits) - 1);
> + } else {
> + /* Get reading */
> + data = st->recv(client, rxbuf, 1);
> + if (data < 0)
> + return data;
>
> - return 0;
> + data = rxbuf[0];
> }
> - unreachable();
> + *val = data;
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int max1363_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> @@ -426,7 +423,11 @@ static int max1363_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>
> switch (m) {
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> + if (!iio_device_claim_direct(indio_dev))
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> ret = max1363_read_single_chan(indio_dev, chan, val, m);
> + iio_device_release_direct(indio_dev);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> return IIO_VAL_INT;
> @@ -947,46 +948,58 @@ static inline int __max1363_check_event_mask(int
> thismask, int checkmask)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int max1363_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> - const struct iio_chan_spec *chan, enum iio_event_type type,
> +static int __max1363_write_event_config(struct max1363_state *st,
> + const struct iio_chan_spec *chan,
> enum iio_event_direction dir, bool state)
> {
> - struct max1363_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> -
> - iio_device_claim_direct_scoped(return -EBUSY, indio_dev) {
> - int number = chan->channel;
> - u16 unifiedmask;
> - int ret;
> + int number = chan->channel;
> + u16 unifiedmask;
> + int ret;
>
> - guard(mutex)(&st->lock);
> + guard(mutex)(&st->lock);
>
> - unifiedmask = st->mask_low | st->mask_high;
> - if (dir == IIO_EV_DIR_FALLING) {
> + unifiedmask = st->mask_low | st->mask_high;
> + if (dir == IIO_EV_DIR_FALLING) {
>
> - if (state == 0)
> - st->mask_low &= ~(1 << number);
> - else {
> - ret = __max1363_check_event_mask((1 <<
> number),
> -
> unifiedmask);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - st->mask_low |= (1 << number);
> - }
> - } else {
> - if (state == 0)
> - st->mask_high &= ~(1 << number);
> - else {
> - ret = __max1363_check_event_mask((1 <<
> number),
> -
> unifiedmask);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - st->mask_high |= (1 << number);
> - }
> + if (state == 0)
> + st->mask_low &= ~(1 << number);
> + else {
> + ret = __max1363_check_event_mask((1 << number),
> + unifiedmask);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + st->mask_low |= (1 << number);
> + }
> + } else {
> + if (state == 0)
> + st->mask_high &= ~(1 << number);
> + else {
> + ret = __max1363_check_event_mask((1 << number),
> + unifiedmask);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + st->mask_high |= (1 << number);
> }
> }
> - max1363_monitor_mode_update(st, !!(st->mask_high | st->mask_low));
>
> return 0;
> +
> +}
> +static int max1363_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + const struct iio_chan_spec *chan, enum iio_event_type type,
> + enum iio_event_direction dir, bool state)
> +{
> + struct max1363_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!iio_device_claim_direct(indio_dev))
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + ret = __max1363_write_event_config(st, chan, dir, state);
> + iio_device_release_direct(indio_dev);
> + max1363_monitor_mode_update(st, !!(st->mask_high | st->mask_low));
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-17 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-09 18:05 [PATCH v2 00/27] iio: improve handling of direct mode claim and release Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v2 01/27] iio: core: Rework claim and release of direct mode to work with sparse Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-17 10:38 ` Nuno Sá
2025-02-17 12:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-22 15:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-02-22 17:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-22 20:58 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-02-25 6:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-25 7:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-02-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v2 02/27] iio: chemical: scd30: Use guard(mutex) to allow early returns Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-17 10:56 ` Nuno Sá
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 03/27] iio: chemical: scd30: Switch to sparse friendly claim/release_direct() Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 04/27] iio: temperature: tmp006: Stop using iio_device_claim_direct_scoped() Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 05/27] iio: proximity: sx9310: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 06/27] iio: proximity: sx9324: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 07/27] iio: proximity: sx9360: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 08/27] iio: accel: adxl367: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-17 10:44 ` Nuno Sá
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 09/27] iio: adc: ad4000: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-17 10:45 ` Nuno Sá
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 10/27] iio: adc: ad4130: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-17 10:45 ` Nuno Sá
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 11/27] iio: adc: ad4695: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-16 18:19 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-16 19:00 ` David Lechner
2025-02-17 10:48 ` Nuno Sá
2025-02-17 13:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-17 10:48 ` Nuno Sá
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 12/27] iio: adc: ad7606: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-17 10:49 ` Nuno Sá
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 13/27] iio: adc: ad7625: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-17 10:49 ` Nuno Sá
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 14/27] iio: adc: ad7779: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-17 10:50 ` Nuno Sá
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 15/27] iio: adc: ad9467: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-17 10:50 ` Nuno Sá
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 16/27] iio: adc: max1363: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-17 10:51 ` Nuno Sá [this message]
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 17/27] iio: adc: rtq6056: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 18/27] iio: adc: ti-adc161s626: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 19/27] iio: adc: ti-ads1119: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 20/27] iio: addac: ad74413r: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-17 10:52 ` Nuno Sá
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 21/27] iio: chemical: ens160: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 22/27] iio: dac: ad3552r-hs: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-17 10:53 ` Nuno Sá
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 23/27] iio: dac: ad8460: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-17 10:52 ` Nuno Sá
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 24/27] iio: dummy: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-17 10:55 ` Nuno Sá
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 25/27] iio: imu: bmi323: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 26/27] iio: light: bh1745: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 27/27] iio: Drop iio_device_claim_direct_scoped() and related infrastructure Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-17 10:57 ` Nuno Sá
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ea8021c7a68cad5211ac48dff84920e58152d30.camel@gmail.com \
--to=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Mariel.Tinaco@analog.com \
--cc=adureghello@baylibre.com \
--cc=apokusinski01@gmail.com \
--cc=cy_huang@richtek.com \
--cc=demonsingur@gmail.com \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=gstols@baylibre.com \
--cc=gustavograzs@gmail.com \
--cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=joao.goncalves@toradex.com \
--cc=jstephan@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.schmitt@analog.com \
--cc=muditsharma.info@gmail.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=ramona.nechita@analog.com \
--cc=tgamblin@baylibre.com \
--cc=tomasz.duszynski@octakon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox