linux-iio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging:iio: Add wrapper functions around buffer access ops
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:31:44 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111214143144.GL3503@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EE87755.3000000@metafoo.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 440 bytes --]

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:15:49AM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> Marking the function as __must_check doesn't make much sense here. Since it
> will either return an error or the buffer length. So you'll always use the
> returned result one way or the other.

Isn't that the point of a __must_check?

This reminds me of when we added __must_check to ERR_PTR() and
PTR_ERR().  We found places that didn't check.

regards,
dan carpenter


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-14 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-12 10:08 [PATCH] staging:iio: Add wrapper functions around buffer access ops Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-12-13  0:45 ` Greg KH
2011-12-13  9:01   ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-12-13 23:59     ` Greg KH
2011-12-14  7:19       ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-12-14 10:15       ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-12-14 14:31         ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2011-12-14 15:05           ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-12-14 16:42             ` Dan Carpenter
2011-12-14 15:49         ` Greg KH
2011-12-14 17:35           ` Lars-Peter Clausen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111214143144.GL3503@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).