Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] iio: mxs-lradc: add scale attribute to channels

[Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>]

Dear Hector Palacios,

> Hi Marek,
> 
> On 07/19/2013 06:14 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Hector Palacios,
> > 
> >> Dear Marek,
> >> 
> >> On 07/19/2013 04:30 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>> @@ -228,39 +230,12 @@ struct mxs_lradc {
> >>>> 
> >>>>    #define LRADC_RESOLUTION			12
> >>>>    #define LRADC_SINGLE_SAMPLE_MASK		((1 << LRADC_RESOLUTION) 
- 1)
> >>>> 
> >>>> -/*
> >>>> - * Raw I/O operations
> >>>> - */
> >>>> -static int mxs_lradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> >>>> +static int mxs_lradc_read_single(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> >>>> 
> >>>>    			const struct iio_chan_spec *chan,
> >>>>    			int *val, int *val2, long m)
> >>>>    
> >>>>    {
> >>>>    
> >>>>    	struct mxs_lradc *lradc = iio_priv(iio_dev);
> >>>>    	int ret;
> >>>> 
> >>>> -	unsigned long mask;
> >>>> -
> >>>> -	if (m != IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW)
> >>>> -		return -EINVAL;
> >>>> -
> >>>> -	/* Check for invalid channel */
> >>>> -	if (chan->channel > LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS)
> >>>> -		return -EINVAL;
> >>> 
> >>> This was already resolved, so this patch won't apply I'm afraid.
> >> 
> >> You mean the 'unsigned long mask', right?  Yeah, I think I had resolved
> >> that one before submitting, but looks like I didn't.
> >> The other check is not resolved afaik. We agreed to remove it, but on a
> >> different patch.
> > 
> > I mean the other check, yeah. A patch removing that should be applied
> > already.
> 
> Where exactly? It's not fixed in Jonathan's fixes-togreg branch, at least.
> Did you fixed it?

I use linux-next [1], should be it.

http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-
next.git/log/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c

Best regards,
Marek Vasut