From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 13:42:56 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen?= Beisert Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Marek Vasut , Fabio Estevam , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add i.MX23 support to the LRADC driver Message-ID: <20130905104256.GK6329@mwanda> References: <1378299706-6742-1-git-send-email-jbe@pengutronix.de> <1378299706-6742-4-git-send-email-jbe@pengutronix.de> <20130904142738.GH6329@mwanda> <201309051216.18305.jbe@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: <201309051216.18305.jbe@pengutronix.de> List-ID: On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 12:16:18PM +0200, Jürgen Beisert wrote: > I like this simplification, but all the other drivers for the MXS series of > SoCs don't use such a method. Do you think this "new style" will be accepted? > My lradc_plate_mask() is basically the same idea as what Marek said about putting the logic into the define. LRADC....IRQ_MASK(id) (((id) == MX23) ? 0x1ff : 0x1fff) I don't know why Marek is complaining about churn though. This is linux! We love churn! And especially in staging, it's our favorite thing. :P regards, dan carpenter