From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:39:21 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Fabio Estevam Cc: Dan Carpenter , Marek Vasut , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Fabio Estevam , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Rob Herring , Jonathan Cameron , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [patch] iio: mxs-lradc: use helper functions to simplify the code Message-ID: <20130906083920.GO6617@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <201309051216.18305.jbe@pengutronix.de> <20130905181639.GA19090@elgon.mountain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: Russell King - ARM Linux List-ID: On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 05:15:02PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Looks good, just one minor suggestion: > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > +static void lradc_reg_set(struct mxs_lradc *lradc, u32 val, size_t chan) > > +{ > > + writel(val, lradc->base + chan + STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET); > > +} > > + > > +static void lradc_reg_clear(struct mxs_lradc *lradc, u32 val, size_t chan) > > +{ > > + writel(val, lradc->base + chan + STMP_OFFSET_REG_CLR); > > +} > > Maybe 'static inline' ? GCC will already inline these if it thinks they're appropriate for that treatment.