From: Juliana Rodrigues <juliana.orod@gmail.com>
To: Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>
Cc: outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com, lars@metafoo.de,
jic23@kernel.org, knaack.h@gmx.de, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: implemented IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 17:43:12 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161018194312.GB11725@spock> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1610172316480.31400@pmeerw.net>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:27:11PM +0200, Peter Meerwald-Stadler wrote:
>
> > Moved functionality from IIO_DEV_ATTR_SAMP_FREQ macro into
> > IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ in order to create a generic attribute.
> > Modified inv_mpu6050_read_raw and inv_mpu6050_write_raw to allow
> > reading and writing the element.
>
> comments below
Hi Peter,
Lots of typos! I'll send a patchset to fix these also. Thank you for
taking your time to comment on this.
Juliana
>
> > Signed-off-by: Juliana Rodrigues <juliana.orod@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c | 187 ++++++++++++++---------------
> > 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
> > index b9fcbf1..20722c8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
> > @@ -263,6 +263,88 @@ static int inv_mpu6050_sensor_set(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st, int reg,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * inv_mpu6050_set_lpf() - set low pass filer based on fifo rate.
>
> filter
>
> > + *
> > + * Based on the Nyquist principle, the sampling rate must
> > + * exceed twice of the bandwidth of the signal, or there
> > + * would be alising. This function basically search for the
>
> will be
> searches
>
> > + * correct low pass parameters based on the fifo rate, e.g,
>
> e.g.
> but maybe it should be rather i.e.
>
> > + * sampling frequency.
> > + */
> > +static int inv_mpu6050_set_lpf(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st, int rate)
> > +{
> > + const int hz[] = {188, 98, 42, 20, 10, 5};
> > + const int d[] = {INV_MPU6050_FILTER_188HZ, INV_MPU6050_FILTER_98HZ,
> > + INV_MPU6050_FILTER_42HZ, INV_MPU6050_FILTER_20HZ,
> > + INV_MPU6050_FILTER_10HZ, INV_MPU6050_FILTER_5HZ};
>
> it is not/only somewhat obvious that hz and d must have the same number of
> entries, could use a #define to make that clear (and could be used
> instead of ARRAY_SIZE)
>
> > + int i, h, result;
> > + u8 data;
> > +
> > + h = (rate >> 1);
> > + i = 0;
>
> i, h could be unsigned
> can't we use initialization instead of assignment to save some lines?
>
> > + while ((h < hz[i]) && (i < ARRAY_SIZE(d) - 1))
> > + i++;
> > + data = d[i];
> > + result = regmap_write(st->map, st->reg->lpf, data);
> > + if (result)
> > + return result;
> > + st->chip_config.lpf = data;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * inv_mpu6050_write_raw_samp_freq() - Set current raw sampling rate.
>
> frequency is not the same as rate
>
> > + */
> > +static int inv_mpu6050_write_raw_samp_freq(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > + struct inv_mpu6050_state *st,
> > + int val) {
> > +
> > + u8 d;
> > + int result;
> > +
> > + if (val < INV_MPU6050_MIN_FIFO_RATE || val > INV_MPU6050_MAX_FIFO_RATE)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + if (val == st->chip_config.fifo_rate)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> > + if (st->chip_config.enable) {
> > + result = -EBUSY;
> > + goto fifo_rate_fail;
> > + }
> > +
> > + result = inv_mpu6050_set_power_itg(st, true);
> > + if (result)
> > + goto fifo_rate_fail;
> > +
> > + d = INV_MPU6050_ONE_K_HZ / val - 1;
> > +
> > + result = regmap_write(st->map, st->reg->sample_rate_div, d);
> > +
>
> drop newline
>
> > + if (result)
> > + goto fifo_rate_fail;
> > +
> > + st->chip_config.fifo_rate = val;
> > +
> > + result = inv_mpu6050_set_lpf(st, val);
> > +
>
> drop newline
>
> > + if (result)
> > + goto fifo_rate_fail;
> > +
> > +fifo_rate_fail:
> > + result |= inv_mpu6050_set_power_itg(st, false);
> > + mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> > +
>
> just
> return result;
>
> > + if (result)
> > + return result;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> > static int inv_mpu6050_sensor_show(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st, int reg,
> > int axis, int *val)
> > {
> > @@ -399,6 +481,10 @@ inv_mpu6050_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > default:
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> > + *val = st->chip_config.fifo_rate;
> > +
> > + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> > default:
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > @@ -511,6 +597,10 @@ static int inv_mpu6050_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > default:
> > result = -EINVAL;
> > }
> > + break;
> > + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> > + result = inv_mpu6050_write_raw_samp_freq(indio_dev, st, val);
> > + break;
> > default:
> > result = -EINVAL;
> > break;
> > @@ -524,98 +614,6 @@ static int inv_mpu6050_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > - * inv_mpu6050_set_lpf() - set low pass filer based on fifo rate.
> > - *
> > - * Based on the Nyquist principle, the sampling rate must
> > - * exceed twice of the bandwidth of the signal, or there
> > - * would be alising. This function basically search for the
> > - * correct low pass parameters based on the fifo rate, e.g,
> > - * sampling frequency.
> > - */
> > -static int inv_mpu6050_set_lpf(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st, int rate)
> > -{
> > - const int hz[] = {188, 98, 42, 20, 10, 5};
> > - const int d[] = {INV_MPU6050_FILTER_188HZ, INV_MPU6050_FILTER_98HZ,
> > - INV_MPU6050_FILTER_42HZ, INV_MPU6050_FILTER_20HZ,
> > - INV_MPU6050_FILTER_10HZ, INV_MPU6050_FILTER_5HZ};
> > - int i, h, result;
> > - u8 data;
> > -
> > - h = (rate >> 1);
> > - i = 0;
> > - while ((h < hz[i]) && (i < ARRAY_SIZE(d) - 1))
> > - i++;
> > - data = d[i];
> > - result = regmap_write(st->map, st->reg->lpf, data);
> > - if (result)
> > - return result;
> > - st->chip_config.lpf = data;
> > -
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -/**
> > - * inv_mpu6050_fifo_rate_store() - Set fifo rate.
> > - */
> > -static ssize_t
> > -inv_mpu6050_fifo_rate_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> > - const char *buf, size_t count)
> > -{
> > - s32 fifo_rate;
> > - u8 d;
> > - int result;
> > - struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_to_iio_dev(dev);
> > - struct inv_mpu6050_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > -
> > - if (kstrtoint(buf, 10, &fifo_rate))
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - if (fifo_rate < INV_MPU6050_MIN_FIFO_RATE ||
> > - fifo_rate > INV_MPU6050_MAX_FIFO_RATE)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - if (fifo_rate == st->chip_config.fifo_rate)
> > - return count;
> > -
> > - mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> > - if (st->chip_config.enable) {
> > - result = -EBUSY;
> > - goto fifo_rate_fail;
> > - }
> > - result = inv_mpu6050_set_power_itg(st, true);
> > - if (result)
> > - goto fifo_rate_fail;
> > -
> > - d = INV_MPU6050_ONE_K_HZ / fifo_rate - 1;
> > - result = regmap_write(st->map, st->reg->sample_rate_div, d);
> > - if (result)
> > - goto fifo_rate_fail;
> > - st->chip_config.fifo_rate = fifo_rate;
> > -
> > - result = inv_mpu6050_set_lpf(st, fifo_rate);
> > - if (result)
> > - goto fifo_rate_fail;
> > -
> > -fifo_rate_fail:
> > - result |= inv_mpu6050_set_power_itg(st, false);
> > - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> > - if (result)
> > - return result;
> > -
> > - return count;
> > -}
> > -
> > -/**
> > - * inv_fifo_rate_show() - Get the current sampling rate.
> > - */
> > -static ssize_t
> > -inv_fifo_rate_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> > - char *buf)
> > -{
> > - struct inv_mpu6050_state *st = iio_priv(dev_to_iio_dev(dev));
> > -
> > - return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", st->chip_config.fifo_rate);
> > -}
> > -
> > -/**
> > * inv_attr_show() - calling this function will show current
> > * parameters.
> > *
> > @@ -686,6 +684,7 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec_ext_info inv_ext_info[] = {
> > .info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE), \
> > .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) | \
> > BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBBIAS), \
> > + .info_mask_shared_by_all = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ), \
> > .scan_index = _index, \
> > .scan_type = { \
> > .sign = 's', \
> > @@ -708,6 +707,7 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec inv_mpu_channels[] = {
> > .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW)
> > | BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET)
> > | BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),
> > + .info_mask_shared_by_all = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ),
> > .scan_index = -1,
> > },
> > INV_MPU6050_CHAN(IIO_ANGL_VEL, IIO_MOD_X, INV_MPU6050_SCAN_GYRO_X),
> > @@ -725,8 +725,6 @@ static IIO_CONST_ATTR(in_anglvel_scale_available,
> > "0.000133090 0.000266181 0.000532362 0.001064724");
> > static IIO_CONST_ATTR(in_accel_scale_available,
> > "0.000598 0.001196 0.002392 0.004785");
> > -static IIO_DEV_ATTR_SAMP_FREQ(S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR, inv_fifo_rate_show,
> > - inv_mpu6050_fifo_rate_store);
> >
> > /* Deprecated: kept for userspace backward compatibility. */
> > static IIO_DEVICE_ATTR(in_gyro_matrix, S_IRUGO, inv_attr_show, NULL,
> > @@ -737,7 +735,6 @@ static IIO_DEVICE_ATTR(in_accel_matrix, S_IRUGO, inv_attr_show, NULL,
> > static struct attribute *inv_attributes[] = {
> > &iio_dev_attr_in_gyro_matrix.dev_attr.attr, /* deprecated */
> > &iio_dev_attr_in_accel_matrix.dev_attr.attr, /* deprecated */
> > - &iio_dev_attr_sampling_frequency.dev_attr.attr,
> > &iio_const_attr_sampling_frequency_available.dev_attr.attr,
> > &iio_const_attr_in_accel_scale_available.dev_attr.attr,
> > &iio_const_attr_in_anglvel_scale_available.dev_attr.attr,
> >
>
> --
>
> Peter Meerwald-Stadler
> +43-664-2444418 (mobile)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-18 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-14 2:20 [PATCH] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: implemented IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ Juliana Rodrigues
2016-10-15 14:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-10-18 19:36 ` Juliana Rodrigues
2016-10-22 17:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-10-17 21:27 ` Peter Meerwald-Stadler
2016-10-18 19:43 ` Juliana Rodrigues [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161018194312.GB11725@spock \
--to=juliana.orod@gmail.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).