From: Eva Rachel Retuya <eraretuya@gmail.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@gmail.com>,
Alison Schofield <amsfield22@gmail.com>,
Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@heig-vd.ch>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] iio: accel: adxl345: Setup DATA_READY trigger
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 20:15:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170502121554.GD3030@Socrates-UM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VcTptSxGnHJzosbio-8PG3ojgr2vfhL9QuUf+OgeCQWGA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 02:31:00PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
[...]
> > -int adxl345_core_probe(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap,
> > +int adxl345_core_probe(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap, int irq,
> > const char *name);
>
> I think I commented this once. Instead of increasing parameters,
> please introduce a new struct (as separate preparatory patch) which
> will hold current parameters. Let's call it
> strut adxl345_chip {
> struct device *dev;
> struct regmap *regmap;
> const char *name;
> };
>
> I insisnt in this chage.
I'm not sure if what you want is more simpler, is it something like what
this driver does?
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/iio/gyro/mpu3050.h#L41
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/iio/gyro/mpu3050-i2c.c#L34
>
> > #include <linux/delay.h>
> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
>
> > +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
>
> Can we get rid of gnostic resource providers?
>
I'm uninformed and still learning. Please let me know how to approach
this in some other way.
> > +static const struct iio_trigger_ops adxl345_trigger_ops = {
>
> > + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>
> Do we still need this kind of lines?
>
I'm not sure either.
Jonathan, is it OK to omit this and also the one below?
> > + .set_trigger_state = adxl345_drdy_trigger_set_state,
> > +};
>
> > static const struct iio_info adxl345_info = {
>
> > .driver_module = THIS_MODULE,
>
> Ditto, though it's in the current code.
>
> > .read_raw = adxl345_read_raw,
> > };
>
> > + /*
> > + * Any bits set to 0 send their respective interrupts to the INT1 pin,
> > + * whereas bits set to 1 send their respective interrupts to the INT2
> > + * pin. Map all interrupts to the specified pin.
> > + */
> > + of_irq = of_irq_get_byname(dev->of_node, "INT2");
>
> So, can we get it in resourse provider agnostic way?
>
> > + if (of_irq == irq)
> > + regval = 0xFF;
> > + else
> > + regval = 0x00;
>
> regval = of_irq == irq ? 0xff : 0x00; ?
>
OK.
Thanks,
Eva
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, ADXL345_REG_INT_MAP, regval);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to set up interrupts: %d\n", ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-02 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-29 7:48 [PATCH v2 0/4] iio: accel: adxl345: Add support for buffered readings Eva Rachel Retuya
2017-04-29 7:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: iio: accel: adxl345: Add optional interrupt-names support Eva Rachel Retuya
2017-04-29 7:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] iio: accel: adxl345_core: Introduce set_mode and data_ready functions Eva Rachel Retuya
2017-05-01 0:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-05-01 19:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-05-01 19:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-05-01 20:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-05-01 20:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-05-02 11:39 ` Eva Rachel Retuya
2017-05-02 16:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-05-10 13:07 ` Eva Rachel Retuya
2017-05-01 11:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-05-02 11:46 ` Eva Rachel Retuya
2017-04-29 7:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] iio: accel: adxl345: Setup DATA_READY trigger Eva Rachel Retuya
2017-05-01 0:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-05-02 3:01 ` Rob Herring
2017-05-02 15:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-05-10 14:33 ` Eva Rachel Retuya
2017-05-02 11:59 ` Eva Rachel Retuya
2017-05-01 11:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-05-02 12:15 ` Eva Rachel Retuya [this message]
2017-05-02 21:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-05-10 13:24 ` Eva Rachel Retuya
2017-05-14 15:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-05-14 16:08 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-05-05 18:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-05-10 13:31 ` Eva Rachel Retuya
2017-04-29 7:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] iio: accel: adxl345: Add support for triggered buffer Eva Rachel Retuya
2017-05-01 0:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-05-02 12:23 ` Eva Rachel Retuya
2017-05-02 16:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-05-01 11:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-05-02 12:24 ` Eva Rachel Retuya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170502121554.GD3030@Socrates-UM \
--to=eraretuya@gmail.com \
--cc=amsfield22@gmail.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.baluta@gmail.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=florian.vaussard@heig-vd.ch \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).