Linux IIO development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.bianconi@st.com,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: pressure: st_pressure_spi: add OF capability to st_pressure_spi
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 20:51:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170624205139.52cd341f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170622175742.25696-1-lorenzo.bianconi@st.com>

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 19:57:42 +0200
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com> wrote:

> Add device tree support for LPS22HB pressure sensor
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@st.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/pressure/st_pressure_spi.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/st_pressure_spi.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/st_pressure_spi.c
> index 550508025af1..6dde7cc3e999 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/pressure/st_pressure_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/st_pressure_spi.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,19 @@
>  #include <linux/iio/common/st_sensors_spi.h>
>  #include "st_pressure.h"
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static const struct of_device_id st_press_of_match[] = {
> +	{
> +		.compatible = "st,lps22hb-press",
Rob requested the other day that we don't do this sort
of naming.  That particular discussion was about a dual
chip package. Here as far as I can tell the lsp22hb is
only ever a simple pressure sensor.  Hence can we drop the
-press? 
If we need to have it for backwards compatibility then
perhaps both is the way to go with the press version clearly
marked as deprecated.
> +		.data = LPS22HB_PRESS_DEV_NAME,
> +	},
> +	{},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, st_press_of_match);
> +#else
> +#define st_press_of_match	NULL
> +#endif
> +
>  static int st_press_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  {
>  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> @@ -30,6 +43,8 @@ static int st_press_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  
>  	press_data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>  
> +	st_sensors_of_name_probe(&spi->dev, st_press_of_match,
> +				 spi->modalias, sizeof(spi->modalias));
>  	st_sensors_spi_configure(indio_dev, spi, press_data);
>  
>  	err = st_press_common_probe(indio_dev);
> @@ -58,6 +73,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, st_press_id_table);
>  static struct spi_driver st_press_driver = {
>  	.driver = {
>  		.name = "st-press-spi",
> +		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(st_press_of_match),
>  	},
>  	.probe = st_press_spi_probe,
>  	.remove = st_press_spi_remove,


      reply	other threads:[~2017-06-24 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-22 17:57 [PATCH] iio: pressure: st_pressure_spi: add OF capability to st_pressure_spi Lorenzo Bianconi
2017-06-24 19:51 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170624205139.52cd341f@kernel.org \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.bianconi@st.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox