From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@intel.com>,
Matt Ranostay <matt.ranostay@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: adc: ti-ads1015: use dynamically generated attributes
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 15:11:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170809151100.592dab5e@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170801082646.yfkcdfrchsdagw4m@lenoch>
On Tue, 1 Aug 2017 10:26:46 +0200
Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org> wrote:
> Generate attributes dynamically based on actual values used
> by driver - leads to slightly smaller code (on ARM and X64)
> Scale and sampling frequency definitions are at one place now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org>
Sorry, for the small gain I am unconvinced. If this was a new
driver and it had been submitted this way I wouldn't be asking
for it to be changed, but I'm also not interested in the churn and
additional code for what must be a pretty small chance.
Also if you really want to do tinification patches, please post
the actual sizes of the various regions. In particular you need
to generally have a fairly large saving to justify replacing
stuff that is constant with code.
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1015.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1015.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1015.c
> index 86fd2753869d..2795553d5340 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1015.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1015.c
> @@ -73,28 +73,30 @@ enum ads1015_channels {
> ADS1015_TIMESTAMP,
> };
>
> -static const unsigned int ads1015_data_rate[] = {
> +static const unsigned short ads1015_data_rate[] = {
> 128, 250, 490, 920, 1600, 2400, 3300, 3300
> };
>
> -static const unsigned int ads1115_data_rate[] = {
> +static const unsigned short ads1115_data_rate[] = {
> 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 250, 475, 860
> };
>
> static const struct {
> - int scale;
> - int uscale;
> + short scale;
> + short mscale;
> } ads1015_scale[] = {
> - {3, 0},
> - {2, 0},
> - {1, 0},
> - {0, 500000},
> - {0, 250000},
> - {0, 125000},
> - {0, 125000},
> - {0, 125000},
> + { 3, 0 },
> + { 2, 0 },
> + { 1, 0 },
> + { 0, 500 },
> + { 0, 250 },
> + { 0, 125 },
> + { 0, 125 },
> + { 0, 125 },
> };
>
> +#define ADS1015_SCALES_SIZE (ARRAY_SIZE(ads1015_scale) - 2)
> +
> #define ADS1015_V_CHAN(_chan, _addr) { \
> .type = IIO_VOLTAGE, \
> .indexed = 1, \
> @@ -182,7 +184,8 @@ struct ads1015_data {
> struct mutex lock;
> struct ads1015_channel_data channel_data[ADS1015_CHANNELS];
>
> - unsigned int *data_rate;
> + unsigned short *data_rate;
> + unsigned char data_rate_size;
> };
>
> static bool ads1015_is_writeable_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
> @@ -303,9 +306,9 @@ static int ads1015_set_scale(struct ads1015_data *data, int chan,
> {
> int i, ret, rindex = -1;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ads1015_scale); i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < ADS1015_SCALES_SIZE; i++)
> if (ads1015_scale[i].scale == scale &&
> - ads1015_scale[i].uscale == uscale) {
> + ads1015_scale[i].mscale * 1000 == uscale) {
> rindex = i;
> break;
> }
> @@ -327,7 +330,7 @@ static int ads1015_set_data_rate(struct ads1015_data *data, int chan, int rate)
> {
> int i, ret, rindex = -1;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ads1015_data_rate); i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < data->data_rate_size; i++)
> if (data->data_rate[i] == rate) {
> rindex = i;
> break;
> @@ -386,7 +389,7 @@ static int ads1015_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> idx = data->channel_data[chan->address].pga;
> *val = ads1015_scale[idx].scale;
> - *val2 = ads1015_scale[idx].uscale;
> + *val2 = ads1015_scale[idx].mscale * 1000;
> ret = IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> break;
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> @@ -446,16 +449,44 @@ static const struct iio_buffer_setup_ops ads1015_buffer_setup_ops = {
> .validate_scan_mask = &iio_validate_scan_mask_onehot,
> };
>
> -static IIO_CONST_ATTR(scale_available, "3 2 1 0.5 0.25 0.125");
> +static ssize_t ads1015_show_scales(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + int i;
> + ssize_t l = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ADS1015_SCALES_SIZE; i++)
> + l += sprintf(buf + l, "%u.%03u%c",
> + ads1015_scale[i].scale, ads1015_scale[i].mscale,
> + i == ADS1015_SCALES_SIZE - 1 ? '\n' : ' ');
> +
> + return l;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t ads1015_show_sample_rates(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + char *buf)
> +{
> + int i;
> + ssize_t l = 0;
> + struct ads1015_data *data = iio_priv(dev_to_iio_dev(dev));
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < data->data_rate_size; i++)
> + l += sprintf(buf + l, "%u%c", data->data_rate[i],
> + i == data->data_rate_size - 1 ? '\n' : ' ');
> +
> + return l;
> +}
> +
> +static IIO_DEVICE_ATTR(scale_available, S_IRUGO,
> + ads1015_show_scales, NULL, 0);
> +static IIO_DEVICE_ATTR(sampling_frequency_available, S_IRUGO,
> + ads1015_show_sample_rates, NULL, 0);
>
> -static IIO_CONST_ATTR_NAMED(ads1015_sampling_frequency_available,
> - sampling_frequency_available, "128 250 490 920 1600 2400 3300");
> -static IIO_CONST_ATTR_NAMED(ads1115_sampling_frequency_available,
> - sampling_frequency_available, "8 16 32 64 128 250 475 860");
>
> static struct attribute *ads1015_attributes[] = {
> - &iio_const_attr_scale_available.dev_attr.attr,
> - &iio_const_attr_ads1015_sampling_frequency_available.dev_attr.attr,
> + &iio_dev_attr_scale_available.dev_attr.attr,
> + &iio_dev_attr_sampling_frequency_available.dev_attr.attr,
> NULL,
> };
>
> @@ -463,16 +494,6 @@ static const struct attribute_group ads1015_attribute_group = {
> .attrs = ads1015_attributes,
> };
>
> -static struct attribute *ads1115_attributes[] = {
> - &iio_const_attr_scale_available.dev_attr.attr,
> - &iio_const_attr_ads1115_sampling_frequency_available.dev_attr.attr,
> - NULL,
> -};
> -
> -static const struct attribute_group ads1115_attribute_group = {
> - .attrs = ads1115_attributes,
> -};
> -
> static const struct iio_info ads1015_info = {
> .driver_module = THIS_MODULE,
> .read_raw = ads1015_read_raw,
> @@ -480,13 +501,6 @@ static const struct iio_info ads1015_info = {
> .attrs = &ads1015_attribute_group,
> };
>
> -static const struct iio_info ads1115_info = {
> - .driver_module = THIS_MODULE,
> - .read_raw = ads1015_read_raw,
> - .write_raw = ads1015_write_raw,
> - .attrs = &ads1115_attribute_group,
> -};
> -
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> static int ads1015_get_channels_config_of(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> @@ -594,6 +608,7 @@ static int ads1015_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> indio_dev->dev.of_node = client->dev.of_node;
> indio_dev->name = ADS1015_DRV_NAME;
> indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> + indio_dev->info = &ads1015_info;
>
> if (client->dev.of_node)
> chip = (enum chip_ids)of_device_get_match_data(&client->dev);
> @@ -603,14 +618,14 @@ static int ads1015_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> case ADS1015:
> indio_dev->channels = ads1015_channels;
> indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(ads1015_channels);
> - indio_dev->info = &ads1015_info;
> - data->data_rate = (unsigned int *) &ads1015_data_rate;
> + data->data_rate = (unsigned short *) &ads1015_data_rate;
> + data->data_rate_size = ARRAY_SIZE(ads1015_data_rate) - 1;
> break;
> case ADS1115:
> indio_dev->channels = ads1115_channels;
> indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(ads1115_channels);
> - indio_dev->info = &ads1115_info;
> - data->data_rate = (unsigned int *) &ads1115_data_rate;
> + data->data_rate = (unsigned short *) &ads1115_data_rate;
> + data->data_rate_size = ARRAY_SIZE(ads1115_data_rate);
> break;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-09 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-01 8:25 [PATCH 0/2] iio: adc: ti-ads1015: fix channel crosstalk Ladislav Michl
2017-08-01 8:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] iio: adc: ti-ads1015: fix conversion time Ladislav Michl
2017-08-01 9:09 ` Daniel Baluta
2017-08-01 9:59 ` Ladislav Michl
2017-08-01 16:25 ` Daniel Baluta
2017-08-09 14:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-08-09 16:27 ` Ladislav Michl
2017-08-01 8:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] iio: adc: ti-ads1015: use dynamically generated attributes Ladislav Michl
2017-08-09 14:11 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2017-08-09 16:44 ` Ladislav Michl
2017-08-12 11:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170809151100.592dab5e@archlinux \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.baluta@intel.com \
--cc=ladis@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt.ranostay@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox