From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Harinath Nampally <harinath922@gmail.com>
Cc: knaack.h@gmx.de, lars@metafoo.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amsfield22@gmail.com,
martink@posteo.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: accel: mma8452: Rename structs holding event configuration registers to more appropriate names.
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 18:56:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170930185638.289ff0bf@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1506275376-5037-1-git-send-email-harinath922@gmail.com>
On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 13:49:36 -0400
Harinath Nampally <harinath922@gmail.com> wrote:
> Improves code readability, no impact on functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Harinath Nampally <harinath922@gmail.com>
I'm unconvinced by this one. At some point we have to map from the
devices own description to that of IIO. The naming currently does
this when the structures are created - all this rename does is
push this remapping of naming down into the functions.
If others thing this helps then I don't really care either way..
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c b/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c
> index 6194169..3472e7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c
> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ struct mma8452_event_regs {
> u8 ev_count;
> };
>
> -static const struct mma8452_event_regs ev_regs_accel_falling = {
> +static const struct mma8452_event_regs ff_mt_ev_regs = {
> .ev_cfg = MMA8452_FF_MT_CFG,
> .ev_cfg_ele = MMA8452_FF_MT_CFG_ELE,
> .ev_cfg_chan_shift = MMA8452_FF_MT_CHAN_SHIFT,
> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static const struct mma8452_event_regs ev_regs_accel_falling = {
> .ev_count = MMA8452_FF_MT_COUNT
> };
>
> -static const struct mma8452_event_regs ev_regs_accel_rising = {
> +static const struct mma8452_event_regs trans_ev_regs = {
> .ev_cfg = MMA8452_TRANSIENT_CFG,
> .ev_cfg_ele = MMA8452_TRANSIENT_CFG_ELE,
> .ev_cfg_chan_shift = MMA8452_TRANSIENT_CHAN_SHIFT,
> @@ -777,12 +777,12 @@ static int mma8452_get_event_regs(struct mma8452_data *data,
> & MMA8452_INT_TRANS) &&
> (data->chip_info->enabled_events
> & MMA8452_INT_TRANS))
> - *ev_reg = &ev_regs_accel_rising;
> + *ev_reg = &trans_ev_regs;
> else
> - *ev_reg = &ev_regs_accel_falling;
> + *ev_reg = &ff_mt_ev_regs;
> return 0;
> case IIO_EV_DIR_FALLING:
> - *ev_reg = &ev_regs_accel_falling;
> + *ev_reg = &ff_mt_ev_regs;
> return 0;
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-30 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-24 17:49 [PATCH] iio: accel: mma8452: Rename structs holding event configuration registers to more appropriate names Harinath Nampally
2017-09-30 17:56 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170930185638.289ff0bf@archlinux \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=amsfield22@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=harinath922@gmail.com \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martink@posteo.de \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).