linux-iio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Himanshi Jain <himshijain.hj@gmail.com>
Cc: outreachy-kernel <outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com>,
	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@gmail.com>,
	Alison Schofield <amsfield22@gmail.com>,
	"Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: ade7753: replace mlock with driver private lock
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 21:17:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170930211706.790583cd@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKJRnmPZoDgtk0vSZydQ9MG_NUD6-NGEY9u8Nkc24vDzVZDQXQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 20:27:09 +0530
Himanshi Jain <himshijain.hj@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 12:29:52 +0530
> > Himanshi Jain <himshijain.hj@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  
> >> Replace driver usage of mlock with driver private lock to meet the new
> >> model where usage of iio_dev->mlock is being redefined as protecting
> >> operating mode changes(changes between BUFFER* and DIRECT modes).
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Himanshi Jain <himshijain.hj@gmail.com>  
> >
> > A well presented patch making a sensible change.  My only thought here
> > is that ultimately we could cover bother the buffer protection and
> > the state protection with a single lock.
> >
> > Hmm. The new lock (as was the old mlock code) is providing protection
> > to ensure we end up with consistent state when changing the
> > sampling frequency between the sampling frequency and the
> > bus clock speed (which has different maximum values depending
> > on the current sampling frequency). In similar cases we have
> > expanded the meaning on the buffer lock to fulfil both roles
> > - that could be done here as well, although you have to be careful
> > about deadlocks.
> >  
> 
> I have understood how to use a single lock for both the purposes as you have
> quoted in Katie's patch too i.e. by making an unlocked version of the function
> ade7753_spi_write_reg_16(). And since the function is not publicly available
> to be used, an unlocked version will not create any issue(which is why I am
> assuming, we are not using nested locks - Please correct me if I am wrong.)
> 
> I will submit a new patch with a single lock.

That's great, but please do it on top of your previous patch as that is now
in a non rebasing tree.

Jonathan

> 
> > On reflection I think this patch is worthwhile applying even
> > if this new lock gets dropped again in some later rework of this
> > driver.
> >
> > Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for
> > the autobuilders to play with it.
> >  
> 
> Thank you for reviewing and applying the patch and guiding for a better logical
> solution.
> 
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jonathan  
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7753.c | 7 +++++--
> >>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7753.c b/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7753.c
> >> index ce26abdea..745c5a6 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7753.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7753.c
> >> @@ -81,10 +81,12 @@
> >>   * @tx:         transmit buffer
> >>   * @rx:         receive buffer
> >>   * @buf_lock:       mutex to protect tx and rx
> >> + * @lock:    protect sensor data
> >>   **/
> >>  struct ade7753_state {
> >>       struct spi_device   *us;
> >>       struct mutex        buf_lock;
> >> +     struct mutex        lock; /* protect sensor data */
> >>       u8          tx[ADE7753_MAX_TX] ____cacheline_aligned;
> >>       u8          rx[ADE7753_MAX_RX];
> >>  };
> >> @@ -483,7 +485,7 @@ static ssize_t ade7753_write_frequency(struct device *dev,
> >>       if (!val)
> >>               return -EINVAL;
> >>
> >> -     mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> >> +     mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> >>
> >>       t = 27900 / val;
> >>       if (t > 0)
> >> @@ -504,7 +506,7 @@ static ssize_t ade7753_write_frequency(struct device *dev,
> >>       ret = ade7753_spi_write_reg_16(dev, ADE7753_MODE, reg);
> >>
> >>  out:
> >> -     mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> >> +     mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> >>
> >>       return ret ? ret : len;
> >>  }
> >> @@ -580,6 +582,7 @@ static int ade7753_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> >>       st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >>       st->us = spi;
> >>       mutex_init(&st->buf_lock);
> >> +     mutex_init(&st->lock);
> >>
> >>       indio_dev->name = spi->dev.driver->name;
> >>       indio_dev->dev.parent = &spi->dev;  
> >  
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-30 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-18  6:59 [PATCH] staging: iio: ade7753: replace mlock with driver private lock Himanshi Jain
2017-09-18 10:06 ` Greg KH
2017-09-24 14:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-09-27 14:57   ` Himanshi Jain
2017-09-30 20:17     ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-03-12 13:32 simran singhal
2017-03-13 12:00 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2017-03-13 12:33   ` SIMRAN SINGHAL
2017-03-13 13:34     ` Lars-Peter Clausen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170930211706.790583cd@archlinux \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=amsfield22@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel.baluta@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=himshijain.hj@gmail.com \
    --cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).