From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Himanshi Jain <himshijain.hj@gmail.com>
Cc: outreachy-kernel <outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@gmail.com>,
Alison Schofield <amsfield22@gmail.com>,
"Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: ade7753: replace mlock with driver private lock
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 21:17:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170930211706.790583cd@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKJRnmPZoDgtk0vSZydQ9MG_NUD6-NGEY9u8Nkc24vDzVZDQXQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 20:27:09 +0530
Himanshi Jain <himshijain.hj@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 12:29:52 +0530
> > Himanshi Jain <himshijain.hj@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Replace driver usage of mlock with driver private lock to meet the new
> >> model where usage of iio_dev->mlock is being redefined as protecting
> >> operating mode changes(changes between BUFFER* and DIRECT modes).
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Himanshi Jain <himshijain.hj@gmail.com>
> >
> > A well presented patch making a sensible change. My only thought here
> > is that ultimately we could cover bother the buffer protection and
> > the state protection with a single lock.
> >
> > Hmm. The new lock (as was the old mlock code) is providing protection
> > to ensure we end up with consistent state when changing the
> > sampling frequency between the sampling frequency and the
> > bus clock speed (which has different maximum values depending
> > on the current sampling frequency). In similar cases we have
> > expanded the meaning on the buffer lock to fulfil both roles
> > - that could be done here as well, although you have to be careful
> > about deadlocks.
> >
>
> I have understood how to use a single lock for both the purposes as you have
> quoted in Katie's patch too i.e. by making an unlocked version of the function
> ade7753_spi_write_reg_16(). And since the function is not publicly available
> to be used, an unlocked version will not create any issue(which is why I am
> assuming, we are not using nested locks - Please correct me if I am wrong.)
>
> I will submit a new patch with a single lock.
That's great, but please do it on top of your previous patch as that is now
in a non rebasing tree.
Jonathan
>
> > On reflection I think this patch is worthwhile applying even
> > if this new lock gets dropped again in some later rework of this
> > driver.
> >
> > Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for
> > the autobuilders to play with it.
> >
>
> Thank you for reviewing and applying the patch and guiding for a better logical
> solution.
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jonathan
> >> ---
> >> drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7753.c | 7 +++++--
> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7753.c b/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7753.c
> >> index ce26abdea..745c5a6 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7753.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7753.c
> >> @@ -81,10 +81,12 @@
> >> * @tx: transmit buffer
> >> * @rx: receive buffer
> >> * @buf_lock: mutex to protect tx and rx
> >> + * @lock: protect sensor data
> >> **/
> >> struct ade7753_state {
> >> struct spi_device *us;
> >> struct mutex buf_lock;
> >> + struct mutex lock; /* protect sensor data */
> >> u8 tx[ADE7753_MAX_TX] ____cacheline_aligned;
> >> u8 rx[ADE7753_MAX_RX];
> >> };
> >> @@ -483,7 +485,7 @@ static ssize_t ade7753_write_frequency(struct device *dev,
> >> if (!val)
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >>
> >> - mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> >> + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> >>
> >> t = 27900 / val;
> >> if (t > 0)
> >> @@ -504,7 +506,7 @@ static ssize_t ade7753_write_frequency(struct device *dev,
> >> ret = ade7753_spi_write_reg_16(dev, ADE7753_MODE, reg);
> >>
> >> out:
> >> - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> >> + mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> >>
> >> return ret ? ret : len;
> >> }
> >> @@ -580,6 +582,7 @@ static int ade7753_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> >> st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >> st->us = spi;
> >> mutex_init(&st->buf_lock);
> >> + mutex_init(&st->lock);
> >>
> >> indio_dev->name = spi->dev.driver->name;
> >> indio_dev->dev.parent = &spi->dev;
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-30 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-18 6:59 [PATCH] staging: iio: ade7753: replace mlock with driver private lock Himanshi Jain
2017-09-18 10:06 ` Greg KH
2017-09-24 14:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-09-27 14:57 ` Himanshi Jain
2017-09-30 20:17 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-03-12 13:32 simran singhal
2017-03-13 12:00 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2017-03-13 12:33 ` SIMRAN SINGHAL
2017-03-13 13:34 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170930211706.790583cd@archlinux \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=amsfield22@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.baluta@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=himshijain.hj@gmail.com \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).