From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Klinger <ak@it-klinger.de>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio/proximity/srf08: Improve unlocking of a mutex in srf08_read_ranging()
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 17:18:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171026171831.3e8018d2@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <62f61dbd-b106-1d3f-fb75-3fa87251e6ef@users.sourceforge.net>
On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 17:00:07 +0200
SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:51:08 +0200
>
> Add a jump target so that a call of the function "mutex_unlock" is stored
> only once at the end of this function implementation.
> Replace two calls by goto statements.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
This simple case is a reasonable change. A few minor points though.
Firstly, for a given subsystem please look at other patches to identify
the standard formatting used in patch titles.
Secondly make sure you don't make unconnected changes. Here there
is a whitespace change that should not be here.
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c | 14 +++++---------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c
> index f2bf783f829a..85957550195b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c
> @@ -135,8 +135,7 @@ static int srf08_read_ranging(struct srf08_data *data)
> SRF08_WRITE_COMMAND, SRF08_CMD_RANGING_CM);
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(&client->dev, "write command - err: %d\n", ret);
> - mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> - return ret;
> + goto unlock;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -163,20 +162,17 @@ static int srf08_read_ranging(struct srf08_data *data)
>
> if (ret >= 255 || ret <= 0) {
> dev_err(&client->dev, "device not ready\n");
> - mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> - return -EIO;
> + ret = -EIO;
> + goto unlock;
> }
>
> ret = i2c_smbus_read_word_swapped(data->client,
> SRF08_READ_ECHO_1_HIGH);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> + if (ret < 0)
> dev_err(&client->dev, "cannot read distance: ret=%d\n", ret);
> - mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> - return ret;
> - }
>
> +unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> -
Please don't make unconnected white space changes.
> return ret;
> }
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-26 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-26 15:00 [PATCH] iio/proximity/srf08: Improve unlocking of a mutex in srf08_read_ranging() SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-26 16:18 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171026171831.3e8018d2@archlinux \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@it-klinger.de \
--cc=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).