Re: [PATCH 4/4] staging: iio: accel: Move adis16201 driver out of staging

[Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 04:18:26PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> I think -M is prefered for these types of diffs?  Not sure.

I wrote about that in the cover letter if you missed. :)

> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 05:24:59PM +0530, Himanshu Jha wrote:
> > +static int adis16201_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > +{
> > +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> > +	struct adis *st;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(*st));
> > +	if (!indio_dev)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > +	spi_set_drvdata(spi, indio_dev);
> > +
> > +	indio_dev->name = spi->dev.driver->name;
> > +	indio_dev->dev.parent = &spi->dev;
> > +	indio_dev->info = &adis16201_info;
> > +
> > +	indio_dev->channels = adis16201_channels;
> > +	indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(adis16201_channels);
> > +	indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> > +
> > +	ret = adis_init(st, indio_dev, spi, &adis16201_data);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = adis_setup_buffer_and_trigger(st, indio_dev, NULL);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> 
> We should clean up the IRQ which we enabled in adis_init() instead of
> returning directly.

I'm not sure about how to do that.

-- 
Thanks
Himanshu Jha