From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk>
To: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jmaneyrol@invensense.com>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: fix fifo count reading
Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 11:20:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180520112046.3216ad81@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1526331955-11869-3-git-send-email-jmaneyrol@invensense.com>
On Mon, 14 May 2018 23:05:53 +0200
Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jmaneyrol@invensense.com> wrote:
> Use unaligned access since buffer is a bytes table. Truncate fifo
> count to read only complete datum.
Hmm. Probably cheaper to enforce the alignment, but I suppose it
doesn't really matter.
Series looks fine except for the minor stuff you have already
said you'll address. I'll take a close look at V2 before applying.
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jmaneyrol@invensense.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c
> index 5436d18..7724888 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/poll.h>
> +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
> #include "inv_mpu_iio.h"
>
> int inv_reset_fifo(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> @@ -98,6 +99,7 @@ irqreturn_t inv_mpu6050_read_fifo(int irq, void *p)
> u16 fifo_count;
> s64 timestamp = pf->timestamp;
> int int_status;
> + size_t i, nb;
>
> mutex_lock(&st->lock);
>
> @@ -132,27 +134,23 @@ irqreturn_t inv_mpu6050_read_fifo(int irq, void *p)
> INV_MPU6050_FIFO_COUNT_BYTE);
> if (result)
> goto end_session;
> - fifo_count = be16_to_cpup((__be16 *)(&data[0]));
> - if (fifo_count < bytes_per_datum)
> - goto end_session;
> - /* fifo count can't be an odd number. If it is odd, reset the FIFO. */
> - if (fifo_count & 1)
> - goto flush_fifo;
> + fifo_count = get_unaligned_be16(&data[0]);
> if (fifo_count > INV_MPU6050_FIFO_THRESHOLD)
> goto flush_fifo;
> - do {
> + /* compute and process all complete datum */
> + nb = fifo_count / bytes_per_datum;
> + for (i = 0; i < nb; ++i) {
> result = regmap_bulk_read(st->map, st->reg->fifo_r_w,
> data, bytes_per_datum);
> if (result)
> goto flush_fifo;
> /* skip first samples if needed */
> - if (st->skip_samples)
> + if (st->skip_samples) {
> st->skip_samples--;
> - else
> - iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, data,
> - timestamp);
> - fifo_count -= bytes_per_datum;
> - } while (fifo_count >= bytes_per_datum);
> + continue;
> + }
> + iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, data, timestamp);
> + }
>
> end_session:
> mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-20 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-14 21:05 [PATCH 1/5] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: replace timestamp fifo by generic timestamp Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol
2018-05-14 21:05 ` [PATCH 2/5] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: switch to use sample rate divider Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol
2018-05-15 19:08 ` Martin Kelly
2018-05-16 7:08 ` Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol
2018-05-16 16:19 ` Martin Kelly
2018-05-14 21:05 ` [PATCH 3/5] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: fix fifo count reading Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol
2018-05-15 19:09 ` Martin Kelly
2018-05-20 10:20 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2018-05-14 21:05 ` [PATCH 4/5] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: better fifo overflow handling Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol
2018-05-15 19:09 ` Martin Kelly
2018-05-14 21:05 ` [PATCH 5/5] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: new timestamp mechanism Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol
2018-05-15 19:31 ` Martin Kelly
2018-05-16 7:33 ` Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol
2018-05-16 16:27 ` Martin Kelly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180520112046.3216ad81@archlinux \
--to=jic23@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk \
--cc=jmaneyrol@invensense.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).