From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:43054 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727813AbeGURWp (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:22:45 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 17:29:24 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Himanshu Jha Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-iio , Daniel Baluta Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] iio: chemical: Add support for Bosch BME680 sensor Message-ID: <20180721172924.53619e6a@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <20180721155230.GB11127@himanshu-Vostro-3559> References: <1532122284-19602-1-git-send-email-himanshujha199640@gmail.com> <20180721161934.75066d97@archlinux> <20180721153607.GA11127@himanshu-Vostro-3559> <20180721155230.GB11127@himanshu-Vostro-3559> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 21:22:30 +0530 Himanshu Jha wrote: > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 06:43:51PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 6:36 PM, Himanshu Jha > > wrote: > > > > >> > + /* Look up table 1 for the possible gas range values */ > > >> > + u32 lookupTable1[16] = {2147483647u, 2147483647u, 2147483647u, > > >> > + 2147483647u, 2147483647u, 2126008810u, > > >> > + 2147483647u, 2130303777u, 2147483647u, > > >> > + 2147483647u, 2143188679u, 2136746228u, > > >> > + 2147483647u, 2126008810u, 2147483647u, > > >> > + 2147483647u}; > > > > This one needs perhaps a bit of though, but... > > > > >> > + /* Look up table 2 for the possible gas range values */ > > >> > + u32 lookupTable2[16] = {4096000000u, 2048000000u, 1024000000u, > > >> > + 512000000u, 255744255u, 127110228u, 64000000u, > > >> > + 32258064u, 16016016u, 8000000u, 4000000u, > > >> > + 2000000u, 1000000u, 500000u, 250000u, 125000u}; > > > > ...this one obviously just a not needed one. You may replace it with a > > one constant and simple calculation to get either value (index from > > value, or value from index). > > Not sure to understand your opinion!? > > Anything related to increase to .ro segment ? > > I think adding is better to let compiler optimise the code a bit > further. No, I missed this as didn't look too closely at those numbers. They are almost by not quite simple power's of 2 * 125000. Question is whether the very very small difference from that matter or not... Andy is suggesting replacing this block of data with an equation that is 'near enough'. > > > -- > > With Best Regards, > > Andy Shevchenko >