From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB56FC43387 for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 19:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9DE20870 for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 19:02:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1547319753; bh=9VYnZKvutdRzsHMWPEZ0PUMX0GgygQaf2ijxdy0egSM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=WfsdVzgH86sbYu7+diatCxqgRhv1wQl5MU6dtVfx/ApMlnE5GpWKdod8vpa/74Ek6 VJolBUGYg6KCwMA4sLwRWb8mpZZtND+UD9v/wANRzr2F/x+70Rcci1EyFEd/wH3fWp 1UuGaXgNh/m1cZPKFd+FTHzQLUBLjGi+zOQY8JVo= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725883AbfALTCd (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2019 14:02:33 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40866 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725851AbfALTCd (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2019 14:02:33 -0500 Received: from archlinux (cpc91196-cmbg18-2-0-cust659.5-4.cable.virginm.net [81.96.234.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2EAA20449; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 19:02:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1547319752; bh=9VYnZKvutdRzsHMWPEZ0PUMX0GgygQaf2ijxdy0egSM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LG8dGIWsYNV0/ZvOii/evAiOEIkaJlXZ8dkgNffd02e7EQnZerOANFzBN1mJj0pWw gDTev/HC2QIPDVeEcsRl1h1E6Sn8YOs/2RwoW4hbmbPnoEvxGGDWIl8v0usvCNWao3 8kwwbiPc/+il3byQ5fiNMEQF+bv8pvD51UxvQ/cU= Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 19:02:27 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Anson Huang Cc: "knaack.h@gmx.de" , "lars@metafoo.de" , "pmeerw@pmeerw.net" , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , dl-linux-imx Subject: Re: [PATCH V9] iio: light: isl29018: add vcc regulator operation support Message-ID: <20190112190227.0fe8f2b0@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <1546938294-26888-1-git-send-email-Anson.Huang@nxp.com> References: <1546938294-26888-1-git-send-email-Anson.Huang@nxp.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 09:09:39 +0000 Anson Huang wrote: > The light sensor's power supply could be controllable by regulator > on some platforms, such as i.MX6Q-SABRESD board, the light sensor > isl29023's power supply is controlled by a GPIO fixed regulator, > need to make sure the regulator is enabled before any operation of > sensor, this patch adds vcc regulator operation support. > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for the autobuilders to play with it. Thanks, Jonathan > --- > ChangeLog since V8: > - use devm_add_action_or_reset instead of devm_add_action to avoid calling regulator disable when failed; > --- > drivers/iio/light/isl29018.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/isl29018.c b/drivers/iio/light/isl29018.c > index b45400f..846df4d 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/light/isl29018.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/light/isl29018.c > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -95,6 +96,7 @@ struct isl29018_chip { > struct isl29018_scale scale; > int prox_scheme; > bool suspended; > + struct regulator *vcc_reg; > }; > > static int isl29018_set_integration_time(struct isl29018_chip *chip, > @@ -708,6 +710,16 @@ static const char *isl29018_match_acpi_device(struct device *dev, int *data) > return dev_name(dev); > } > > +static void isl29018_disable_regulator_action(void *_data) > +{ > + struct isl29018_chip *chip = _data; > + int err; > + > + err = regulator_disable(chip->vcc_reg); > + if (err) > + pr_err("failed to disable isl29018's VCC regulator!\n"); > +} > + > static int isl29018_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > const struct i2c_device_id *id) > { > @@ -742,6 +754,27 @@ static int isl29018_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > chip->scale = isl29018_scales[chip->int_time][0]; > chip->suspended = false; > > + chip->vcc_reg = devm_regulator_get(&client->dev, "vcc"); > + if (IS_ERR(chip->vcc_reg)) { > + err = PTR_ERR(chip->vcc_reg); > + if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER) > + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to get VCC regulator!\n"); > + return err; > + } > + > + err = regulator_enable(chip->vcc_reg); > + if (err) { > + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to enable VCC regulator!\n"); > + return err; > + } > + > + err = devm_add_action_or_reset(&client->dev, isl29018_disable_regulator_action, > + chip); > + if (err) { > + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to setup regulator cleanup action!\n"); > + return err; > + } > + > chip->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, > isl29018_chip_info_tbl[dev_id].regmap_cfg); > if (IS_ERR(chip->regmap)) { > @@ -768,6 +801,7 @@ static int isl29018_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > static int isl29018_suspend(struct device *dev) > { > struct isl29018_chip *chip = iio_priv(dev_get_drvdata(dev)); > + int ret; > > mutex_lock(&chip->lock); > > @@ -777,10 +811,13 @@ static int isl29018_suspend(struct device *dev) > * So we do not have much to do here. > */ > chip->suspended = true; > + ret = regulator_disable(chip->vcc_reg); > + if (ret) > + dev_err(dev, "failed to disable VCC regulator\n"); > > mutex_unlock(&chip->lock); > > - return 0; > + return ret; > } > > static int isl29018_resume(struct device *dev) > @@ -790,6 +827,13 @@ static int isl29018_resume(struct device *dev) > > mutex_lock(&chip->lock); > > + err = regulator_enable(chip->vcc_reg); > + if (err) { > + dev_err(dev, "failed to enable VCC regulator\n"); > + mutex_unlock(&chip->lock); > + return err; > + } > + > err = isl29018_chip_init(chip); > if (!err) > chip->suspended = false;