From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Cc: groeck@chromium.org, enric.balletbo@collabora.com,
bleung@chromium.org, lars@metafoo.de, jic23@kernel.org,
egranata@chromium.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: cros_ec: Add lid angle driver
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 08:24:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190311082405.GB4731@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190228015005.81232-1-gwendal@chromium.org>
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Gwendal Grignou wrote:
> Add a IIO driver that reports the angle between the lid and the base for
> ChromeOS convertible device.
>
> Tested on eve with ToT EC firmware.
> Check driver is loaded and lid angle is correct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
> ---
> drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/Kconfig | 9 +
> drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/Makefile | 1 +
> .../cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_lid_angle.c | 164 ++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c | 15 +-
It doesn't look like there are build dependencies between the changes
in these different subsystems. If my assumption is correct, please
pull the MFD changes out into a separate patch.
> 4 files changed, 186 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_lid_angle.c
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c
> index d275deaecb12..11b5b2fd1f33 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c
> @@ -297,13 +297,17 @@ static void cros_ec_sensors_register(struct cros_ec_dev *ec)
>
> resp = (struct ec_response_motion_sense *)msg->data;
> sensor_num = resp->dump.sensor_count;
> - /* Allocate 1 extra sensors in FIFO are needed */
> - sensor_cells = kcalloc(sensor_num + 1, sizeof(struct mfd_cell),
> + /*
> + * Allocate extra sensors if lid angle sensor or FIFO are needed.
> + */
> +#define NUM_EXTRA_SENSORS 2
Please refrain from placing #defines in the middle of functions.
Move it to the top of the file.
> + sensor_cells = kcalloc(sensor_num + NUM_EXTRA_SENSORS,
Actually, this isn't something that needs defining.
Just change the comment to:
"Allocate 2 extra sensors if lid angle sensor or FIFO are needed."
... and drop the define.
> + sizeof(struct mfd_cell),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (sensor_cells == NULL)
> goto error;
>
> - sensor_platforms = kcalloc(sensor_num + 1,
> + sensor_platforms = kcalloc(sensor_num,
> sizeof(struct cros_ec_sensor_platform),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (sensor_platforms == NULL)
> @@ -363,6 +367,11 @@ static void cros_ec_sensors_register(struct cros_ec_dev *ec)
> sensor_cells[id].name = "cros-ec-ring";
> id++;
> }
> + if (cros_ec_check_features(ec,
> + EC_FEATURE_REFINED_TABLET_MODE_HYSTERESIS)) {
> + sensor_cells[id].name = "cros-ec-lid-angle";
> + id++;
> + }
>
> ret = mfd_add_devices(ec->dev, 0, sensor_cells, id,
> NULL, 0, NULL);
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-11 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-28 1:50 [PATCH] iio: cros_ec: Add lid angle driver Gwendal Grignou
2019-02-28 11:18 ` Enric Balletbo i Serra
2019-02-28 17:41 ` Gwendal Grignou
2019-02-28 17:41 ` [PATCH v2] " Gwendal Grignou
2019-03-03 12:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-03-07 0:33 ` Gwendal Grignou
2019-03-07 0:35 ` [PATCH v3] " Gwendal Grignou
2019-03-07 12:32 ` Enric Balletbo i Serra
2019-03-09 17:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-03-11 8:24 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2019-03-29 8:41 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] " Gwendal Grignou
2019-03-29 13:44 ` Guenter Roeck
2019-03-29 17:40 ` Gwendal Grignou
2019-03-29 20:08 ` [PATCH v5] " Gwendal Grignou
2019-03-29 20:17 ` Guenter Roeck
2019-03-29 22:37 ` Gwendal Grignou
2019-03-29 23:38 ` Guenter Roeck
2019-03-31 10:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190311082405.GB4731@dell \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=egranata@chromium.org \
--cc=enric.balletbo@collabora.com \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox