From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: iio-utils: Fix possible incorrect mask calculation
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 20:38:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190626203824.2abe12d8@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c4b10f0d0d765c1ae972cdf896ddc490fe898c8a.camel@hadess.net>
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 13:34:47 +0200
Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net> wrote:
> On some machines, iio-sensor-proxy was returning all 0's for IIO sensor
> values. It turns out that the bits_used for this sensor is 32, which makes
> the mask calculation:
>
> *mask = (1 << 32) - 1;
>
> If the compiler interprets the 1 literals as 32-bit ints, it generates
> undefined behavior depending on compiler version and optimization level.
> On my system, it optimizes out the shift, so the mask value becomes
>
> *mask = (1) - 1;
>
> With a mask value of 0, iio-sensor-proxy will always return 0 for every axis.
>
> Avoid incorrect 0 values caused by compiler optimization.
>
> See original fix by Brett Dutro <brett.dutro@gmail.com> in
> iio-sensor-proxy:
> https://github.com/hadess/iio-sensor-proxy/commit/9615ceac7c134d838660e209726cd86aa2064fd3
Needs a Signed-off-by:
Otherwise good fix!
Jonathan
> ---
> tools/iio/iio_utils.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/iio/iio_utils.c b/tools/iio/iio_utils.c
> index a22b6e8fad46..7399eb7f1378 100644
> --- a/tools/iio/iio_utils.c
> +++ b/tools/iio/iio_utils.c
> @@ -156,9 +156,9 @@ int iioutils_get_type(unsigned *is_signed, unsigned *bytes, unsigned *bits_used,
> *be = (endianchar == 'b');
> *bytes = padint / 8;
> if (*bits_used == 64)
> - *mask = ~0;
> + *mask = ~(0ULL);
> else
> - *mask = (1ULL << *bits_used) - 1;
> + *mask = (1ULL << *bits_used) - 1ULL;
>
> *is_signed = (signchar == 's');
> if (fclose(sysfsfp)) {
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-26 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-24 11:34 [PATCH] iio: iio-utils: Fix possible incorrect mask calculation Bastien Nocera
2019-06-26 19:38 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190626203824.2abe12d8@archlinux \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=hadess@hadess.net \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox