From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Bobby Jones <rjones@gateworks.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com>,
Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: LSM9DS1 testing with st_lsm6dsx driver
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 23:55:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190920215542.GA16493@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALAE=UDmg_+q=zt9Z6D5BrsnpFXi7dVMdTMVdHk2SMXCtxoJTw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3203 bytes --]
> > LSM9DS1 does not support hw FIFO for the moment. Are you trying to enable
> > buffered reading?
>
> I am not manually interacting with the device at all when this
> exception occurs. This happens during the driver probe.
>
> > Could you please try if the following patch helps? (just compiled)
>
> I no longer receive the exception with this patch and it makes sense, thanks.
Hi Bobby,
thx a lot for testing. Could you please try to drop the previous patch and
apply the following one? Does it fix the issue as well?
iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: check read_fifo pointer in st_lsm6dsx_handler_thread
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
---
drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
index b0f3da1976e4..f4fd4842bd79 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
@@ -666,6 +666,9 @@ static irqreturn_t st_lsm6dsx_handler_thread(int irq, void *private)
struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw = private;
int count;
+ if (!hw->settings->fifo_ops.read_fifo)
+ return IRQ_NONE;
+
mutex_lock(&hw->fifo_lock);
count = hw->settings->fifo_ops.read_fifo(hw);
mutex_unlock(&hw->fifo_lock);
--
2.21.0
>
> For context I'm working with a board that has every data ready and
> interrupt signal connected to the LSM9DS1. Could you clarify what the
> proper usage of the "st,drdy-int-pin" would be in this case and
> whether or not I need more than one interrupt called out in my device
> tree node?
> I'm not really understanding how they're currently being utilized for
> this device in the driver.
For the moment irq line in lsm9ds1 (acc/gyro) is not used at all,
so you can omit the "st,drdy-int-pin" property
>
> Also, I know support for this device was added recently and the combo
> device hardware FIFO is complex, but is support for this something
> that's currently being worked on?
It is actually in my ToDo list but I have no this device at the moment, so
patches are welcome :)
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> Thanks,
> Bobby Jones
>
> > Regards,
> > Lorenzo
> >
> > iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: do not configure the fifo if not supported
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> > index b65a6ca775e0..90a0e5ce44e5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> > @@ -1572,7 +1572,7 @@ int st_lsm6dsx_probe(struct device *dev, int irq, int hw_id,
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > - if (hw->irq > 0) {
> > + if (hw->irq > 0 && hw->settings->fifo_ops.update_fifo) {
> > err = st_lsm6dsx_fifo_setup(hw);
> > if (err < 0)
> > return err;
> > --
> > 2.21.0
> >
> >
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-20 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-20 0:53 LSM9DS1 testing with st_lsm6dsx driver Bobby Jones
2019-09-20 6:42 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-09-20 18:39 ` Bobby Jones
2019-09-20 21:55 ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2019-09-20 23:21 ` Bobby Jones
2019-09-21 8:06 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-09-23 23:23 ` Bobby Jones
2019-09-24 6:18 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-09-24 17:30 ` Bobby Jones
2019-09-24 17:40 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-09-24 18:21 ` Bobby Jones
2019-09-24 18:55 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-10-05 11:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-10-05 12:31 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190920215542.GA16493@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.kepplinger@puri.sm \
--cc=rjones@gateworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox