public inbox for linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/25] iio:imu:st_lsm6dsx Fix alignment and data leak issues
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 09:58:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200526075838.GC339643@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200525170628.503283-13-jic23@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4766 bytes --]

> From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> 
> One of a class of bugs pointed out by Lars in a recent review.
> iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp assumes the buffer used is aligned
> to the size of the timestamp (8 bytes).  This is not guaranteed in
> this driver which uses an array of smaller elements on the stack.
> As Lars also noted this anti pattern can involve a leak of data to
> userspace and that indeed can happen here.  We close both issues by
> moving to a set of suitable structures in the iio_priv() data.
> 
> This data is allocated with kzalloc so no data can leak apart from
> previous readings.
> 
> There has been a lot of churn in this driver, so likely backports
> may be needed for stable.
> 
> Fixes: 290a6ce11d93 ("iio: imu: add support to lsm6dsx driver")
> Reported-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx.h       |  5 ++++
>  .../iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c    | 27 ++++++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx.h b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx.h
> index b56df409ed0f..5bc724eadc83 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx.h
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx.h
> @@ -411,6 +411,11 @@ struct st_lsm6dsx_hw {
>  	const struct st_lsm6dsx_settings *settings;
>  
>  	struct iio_mount_matrix orientation;
> +	/* Ensure natural alignment of buffer elements */
> +	struct {
> +		__le16 channels[3];
> +		s64 ts;
> +	} gyro_scan, acc_scan, ext_scan;
>  };
>  
>  static __maybe_unused const struct iio_event_spec st_lsm6dsx_event = {
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
> index afd00daeefb2..9bcffbfac797 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
> @@ -341,9 +341,6 @@ int st_lsm6dsx_read_fifo(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw)
>  	int err, sip, acc_sip, gyro_sip, ts_sip, ext_sip, read_len, offset;
>  	u16 fifo_len, pattern_len = hw->sip * ST_LSM6DSX_SAMPLE_SIZE;
>  	u16 fifo_diff_mask = hw->settings->fifo_ops.fifo_diff.mask;
> -	u8 gyro_buff[ST_LSM6DSX_IIO_BUFF_SIZE];
> -	u8 acc_buff[ST_LSM6DSX_IIO_BUFF_SIZE];
> -	u8 ext_buff[ST_LSM6DSX_IIO_BUFF_SIZE];
>  	bool reset_ts = false;
>  	__le16 fifo_status;
>  	s64 ts = 0;
> @@ -404,18 +401,21 @@ int st_lsm6dsx_read_fifo(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw)
>  
>  		while (acc_sip > 0 || gyro_sip > 0 || ext_sip > 0) {
>  			if (gyro_sip > 0 && !(sip % gyro_sensor->decimator)) {
> -				memcpy(gyro_buff, &hw->buff[offset],
> -				       ST_LSM6DSX_SAMPLE_SIZE);
> +				memcpy(hw->gyro_scan.channels,
> +				       &hw->buff[offset],
> +				       sizeof(hw->gyro_scan.channels));
>  				offset += ST_LSM6DSX_SAMPLE_SIZE;

what about doing?

offset += sizeof(hw->gyro_scan.channels)

it seems easier to follow, what do you think?

>  			}
>  			if (acc_sip > 0 && !(sip % acc_sensor->decimator)) {
> -				memcpy(acc_buff, &hw->buff[offset],
> -				       ST_LSM6DSX_SAMPLE_SIZE);
> +				memcpy(hw->acc_scan.channels,
> +				       &hw->buff[offset],
> +				       sizeof(hw->acc_scan.channels));
>  				offset += ST_LSM6DSX_SAMPLE_SIZE;

same here

>  			}
>  			if (ext_sip > 0 && !(sip % ext_sensor->decimator)) {
> -				memcpy(ext_buff, &hw->buff[offset],
> -				       ST_LSM6DSX_SAMPLE_SIZE);
> +				memcpy(hw->ext_scan.channels,
> +				       &hw->buff[offset],
> +				       sizeof(hw->ext_scan.channels));
>  				offset += ST_LSM6DSX_SAMPLE_SIZE;

same here

Regards,
Lorenzo

>  			}
>  
> @@ -446,19 +446,22 @@ int st_lsm6dsx_read_fifo(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw)
>  			if (gyro_sip > 0 && !(sip % gyro_sensor->decimator)) {
>  				iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(
>  					hw->iio_devs[ST_LSM6DSX_ID_GYRO],
> -					gyro_buff, gyro_sensor->ts_ref + ts);
> +					&hw->gyro_scan,
> +					gyro_sensor->ts_ref + ts);
>  				gyro_sip--;
>  			}
>  			if (acc_sip > 0 && !(sip % acc_sensor->decimator)) {
>  				iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(
>  					hw->iio_devs[ST_LSM6DSX_ID_ACC],
> -					acc_buff, acc_sensor->ts_ref + ts);
> +					&hw->acc_scan,
> +					acc_sensor->ts_ref + ts);
>  				acc_sip--;
>  			}
>  			if (ext_sip > 0 && !(sip % ext_sensor->decimator)) {
>  				iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(
>  					hw->iio_devs[ST_LSM6DSX_ID_EXT0],
> -					ext_buff, ext_sensor->ts_ref + ts);
> +					&hw->ext_scan,
> +					ext_sensor->ts_ref + ts);
>  				ext_sip--;
>  			}
>  			sip++;
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-26  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-25 17:06 [PATCH 00/25] IIO: 2nd set of timestamp alignment fixes Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 01/25] iio:light:si1145: Fix timestamp alignment and prevent data leak Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 02/25] iio:light:max44000 " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 03/25] iio:light:rpr0521 " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 04/25] iio:light:st_uvis25 " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-26  7:55   ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-05-26 16:53     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-06-07 14:37       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 05/25] iio:light:ltr501 Fix timestamp alignment issue Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 06/25] iio:magnetometer:ak8974: Fix alignment and data leak issues Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-26  9:24   ` Linus Walleij
2020-06-07 14:43     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 07/25] iio:magnetometer:ak8975 " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-26  9:24   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-05-26 16:50     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 08/25] iio:magnetometer:mag3110 " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 09/25] iio:humidity:hdc100x " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-26 19:31   ` Matt Ranostay
2020-06-07 14:51     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 10/25] iio:humidity:hts221 " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-26  7:52   ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-07 14:55     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 11/25] iio:imu:bmi160 " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 12/25] iio:imu:st_lsm6dsx " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-26  7:58   ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2020-06-07 15:07     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 13/25] iio:imu:inv_mpu6050 Fix dma and ts " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 18:44   ` Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol
2020-05-26 16:59     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 14/25] iio:pressure:ms5611 Fix buffer element alignment Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 15/25] iio:pressure:mpl3115 Force alignment of buffer Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 16/25] iio:adc:ti-adc081c Fix alignment and data leak issues Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 17/25] iio:adc:ti-adc084s021 " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 18/25] iio:adc:ti-adc084s021 Tidy up endian types Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 19/25] iio:adc:ti-ads1015 Fix buffer element alignment Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:52   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-05-26  8:11     ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2020-05-26  9:15       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-05-26 16:43         ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-26 17:06           ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-05-26 19:17             ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-26 21:03               ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-05-27 11:41                 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-27 12:37                   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-05-27 14:06                     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-05-27 14:43                     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 20/25] iio:adc:ti-ads124s08 Fix alignment and data leak issues Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 21/25] iio:adc:ti-ads8688 Fix alignment and potential data leak issue Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 22/25] iio:adc:ti-adc0832 Fix alignment issue with timestamp Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 23/25] iio:adc:ti-adc12138 " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 24/25] iio:adc:ina2xx Fix timestamp alignment issue Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 25/25] iio:adc:max1118 Fix alignment of timestamp and data leak issues Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-26 17:02 ` [PATCH 00/25] IIO: 2nd set of timestamp alignment fixes Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200526075838.GC339643@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox