[PATCH v2 4/5] iio:adc:ti-adc128s052: drop of_match_ptr protection

Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-21T17:16:58Z

From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

There is no real advantage in having these protections and
for parts that do not have an explicit ACPI ID, it prevents the
use of PRP0001. I'm trying to clear this out of IIO in general
to avoid copying in new drivers.

Include mod_devicetable.h as we are using of_device_id in here so
including that header is best practice.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Angelo Compagnucci <angelo.compagnucci@gmail.com>
---
v1->v2
* Mention that some parts of valid IDs, so we are interesting in
enabling PRP0001 option for those that don't.

drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
index e86f55ce093f..3143f35a6509 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/spi/spi.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
#include <linux/iio/iio.h>
#include <linux/property.h>
#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
@@ -220,7 +221,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, adc128_acpi_match);
static struct spi_driver adc128_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "adc128s052",
- .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(adc128_of_match),
+ .of_match_table = adc128_of_match,
.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(adc128_acpi_match),
},
.probe = adc128_probe,
--
2.27.0