From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
<lars@metafoo.de>, <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
<jic23@kernel.org>, <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
<dragos.bogdan@analog.com>, <rafael@kernel.org>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/11] iio: buffer: group attr count and attr alloc
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 17:49:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210204174942.000013b3@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210201145105.20459-6-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:50:59 +0200
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote:
> If we want to merge the attributes of the buffer/ and scan_elements/
> directories, we'll need to count all attributes first, then (depending on
> the attribute group) either allocate 2 attribute groups, or a single one.
Probably want to note why we might want to do 2 or 1 group here as it
sounds weird without knowing where this is going.
>
> This change moves the allocation of the buffer/ attributes closer to the
> allocation of the scan_elements/ attributes to make grouping easier.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
This is fine, but one comment on a possible tidy up for another day inline.
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> index cc846988fdb9..23f22be62cc7 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> @@ -1257,41 +1257,16 @@ static int __iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> {
> struct iio_dev_attr *p;
> struct attribute **attr;
> - int ret, i, attrn, attrcount;
> + int ret, i, attrn, scan_el_attrcount, buffer_attrcount;
> const struct iio_chan_spec *channels;
>
> - attrcount = 0;
> + buffer_attrcount = 0;
> if (buffer->attrs) {
> - while (buffer->attrs[attrcount] != NULL)
> - attrcount++;
> + while (buffer->attrs[buffer_attrcount] != NULL)
> + buffer_attrcount++;
> }
>
> - attr = kcalloc(attrcount + ARRAY_SIZE(iio_buffer_attrs) + 1,
> - sizeof(struct attribute *), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!attr)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - memcpy(attr, iio_buffer_attrs, sizeof(iio_buffer_attrs));
> - if (!buffer->access->set_length)
> - attr[0] = &dev_attr_length_ro.attr;
> -
> - if (buffer->access->flags & INDIO_BUFFER_FLAG_FIXED_WATERMARK)
> - attr[2] = &dev_attr_watermark_ro.attr;
> -
> - if (buffer->attrs)
> - memcpy(&attr[ARRAY_SIZE(iio_buffer_attrs)], buffer->attrs,
> - sizeof(struct attribute *) * attrcount);
> -
> - attr[attrcount + ARRAY_SIZE(iio_buffer_attrs)] = NULL;
> -
> - buffer->buffer_group.name = "buffer";
> - buffer->buffer_group.attrs = attr;
> -
> - ret = iio_device_register_sysfs_group(indio_dev, &buffer->buffer_group);
> - if (ret)
> - goto error_free_buffer_attrs;
> -
> - attrcount = 0;
> + scan_el_attrcount = 0;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&buffer->scan_el_dev_attr_list);
> channels = indio_dev->channels;
> if (channels) {
> @@ -1304,7 +1279,7 @@ static int __iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> &channels[i]);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto error_cleanup_dynamic;
> - attrcount += ret;
> + scan_el_attrcount += ret;
> if (channels[i].type == IIO_TIMESTAMP)
> indio_dev->scan_index_timestamp =
> channels[i].scan_index;
> @@ -1319,9 +1294,37 @@ static int __iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> }
> }
>
> + attr = kcalloc(buffer_attrcount + ARRAY_SIZE(iio_buffer_attrs) + 1,
> + sizeof(struct attribute *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!attr) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto error_free_scan_mask;
> + }
> +
> + memcpy(attr, iio_buffer_attrs, sizeof(iio_buffer_attrs));
> + if (!buffer->access->set_length)
> + attr[0] = &dev_attr_length_ro.attr;
> +
> + if (buffer->access->flags & INDIO_BUFFER_FLAG_FIXED_WATERMARK)
> + attr[2] = &dev_attr_watermark_ro.attr;
Again a comment for the future rather than now, but when we are copying
4 items and then looking at whether to change 2 of them it might be cleaner
to just set them directly! Touch of bit rot here :)
> +
> + if (buffer->attrs)
> + memcpy(&attr[ARRAY_SIZE(iio_buffer_attrs)], buffer->attrs,
> + sizeof(struct attribute *) * buffer_attrcount);
> +
> + buffer_attrcount += ARRAY_SIZE(iio_buffer_attrs);
> + attr[buffer_attrcount] = NULL;
> +
> + buffer->buffer_group.name = "buffer";
> + buffer->buffer_group.attrs = attr;
> +
> + ret = iio_device_register_sysfs_group(indio_dev, &buffer->buffer_group);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error_free_buffer_attrs;
> +
> buffer->scan_el_group.name = iio_scan_elements_group_name;
>
> - buffer->scan_el_group.attrs = kcalloc(attrcount + 1,
> + buffer->scan_el_group.attrs = kcalloc(scan_el_attrcount + 1,
> sizeof(buffer->scan_el_group.attrs[0]),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (buffer->scan_el_group.attrs == NULL) {
> @@ -1341,12 +1344,12 @@ static int __iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
>
> error_free_scan_el_attrs:
> kfree(buffer->scan_el_group.attrs);
> +error_free_buffer_attrs:
> + kfree(buffer->buffer_group.attrs);
> error_free_scan_mask:
> bitmap_free(buffer->scan_mask);
> error_cleanup_dynamic:
> iio_free_chan_devattr_list(&buffer->scan_el_dev_attr_list);
> -error_free_buffer_attrs:
> - kfree(buffer->buffer_group.attrs);
>
> return ret;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-04 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-01 14:50 [PATCH v3 00/11] iio: core,buffer: add support for multiple IIO buffers per IIO device Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 14:50 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] docs: ioctl-number.rst: reserve IIO subsystem ioctl() space Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 17:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05 7:08 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 14:50 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] iio: core: register chardev only if needed Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 17:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-01 14:50 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] iio: core-trigger: make iio_device_register_trigger_consumer() an int return Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 14:50 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] iio: core: rework iio device group creation Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 17:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05 7:32 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 14:50 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] iio: buffer: group attr count and attr alloc Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 17:49 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2021-02-05 8:12 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-05 12:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-01 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] iio: core: merge buffer/ & scan_elements/ attributes Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 20:02 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-02 6:07 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-02-03 10:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-04 13:41 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-05 11:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-01 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] iio: add reference to iio buffer on iio_dev_attr Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 18:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05 8:26 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] iio: buffer: wrap all buffer attributes into iio_dev_attr Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 18:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05 9:17 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-05 12:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05 12:57 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-06 14:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-01 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] iio: core: wrap iio device & buffer into struct for character devices Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] iio: buffer: introduce support for attaching more IIO buffers Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 18:34 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05 9:32 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] iio: buffer: add ioctl() to support opening extra buffers for IIO device Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 19:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05 9:51 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-05 12:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05 12:48 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-06 14:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210204174942.000013b3@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=alexandru.ardelean@analog.com \
--cc=dragos.bogdan@analog.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox