From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3907C433E0 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 06:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9839F6529C for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 06:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229649AbhCIGh5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 01:37:57 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:47808 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229607AbhCIGhf (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 01:37:35 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A74D6E; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 22:37:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.20.175]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8C7D3F70D; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 22:37:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 06:37:27 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Jyoti Bhayana , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Sudeep Holla , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , "David S. Miller" , Rob Herring , Lukas Bulwahn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Cristian Marussi , Enrico Granata , Mikhail Golubev , Igor Skalkin , Peter Hilber , Ankit Arora , kernel test robot Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/1] iio/scmi: Adding support for IIO SCMI Based Sensors Message-ID: <20210309063727.a4olkoha5jernvwx@bogus> References: <20210212172235.507028-1-jbhayana@google.com> <20210212172235.507028-2-jbhayana@google.com> <20210221144616.4eef6a79@archlinux> <20210308042842.e6qr4xxp5tl5ahos@bogus> <20210308194841.525ed61f@archlinux> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20210308194841.525ed61f@archlinux> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 07:48:41PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 04:28:42 +0000 > Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:30:37AM -0800, Jyoti Bhayana wrote: > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > > > Thanks for the detailed and careful review of this patch. Good to hear > > > that v7 is not required. Please find below answers to your > > > questions. Looking forward to seeing this patch merged in the next > > > cycle. Thanks for your help in making this happen. > > > > > > > Any update on this ? Please share the branch with is patch so that I > > can pull and ask Cristian to make his changes on top. > Running a bit behind at the moment. > No worries. > Anyhow, there should now be an ib-iio-scmi-5.12-rc1 branch > on https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git > Thanks > Includes making the various long long local variables explicitly > s64 and u64 as relevant. > > Based on the rc1 that eats babies so handle with care :) > 😁 > I've also merge this into the togreg branch of iio.git. > As explained above that wasn't entirely trivial so Jyoti > please take a quick look and check that changes are fine. > Pushed out as testing to let the autobuilders poke at it. > Assuming they don't find anything, it should be fine > for Sudeep to merge that ib and everything will unwind > nicely in Linus' tree next cycle. > Hope so. > There is a bit of an ongoing discussion of an earlier patch > in the IIO tree, so I might end up redoing this merge > if I need to rebase to sort that out, but I'll make sure > the diff is the same (git ID might change). > I can wait for a week or 2 if you think things will settle down by then. We can avoid 2 different git IDs if possible. The main intention was to give some reference to Cristian to rebase/post his series. I am all fine to wait for a week or 2 for final branch. -- Regards, Sudeep