public inbox for linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Cc: lars@metafoo.de, swboyd@chromium.org, campello@chromium.org,
	andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, ardeleanalex@gmail.com,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] iio: sx9310: Fix access to variable DT array
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:18:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210329131831.7eff5058@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210326184603.251683-2-gwendal@chromium.org>

On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 11:46:02 -0700
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org> wrote:

> With the current code, we want to read 4 entries from DT array
> "semtech,combined-sensors". If there are less, we silently fail as
> of_property_read_u32_array() returns -EOVERFLOW.
> 
> First count the number of entries and if between 1 and 4, collect the
> content of the array.
> 
> Fixes: 5b19ca2c78a0 ("iio: sx9310: Set various settings from DT")
> Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>

Applying this one to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git.

As the second patch isn't a fix it might take a while to get applied.
Gwendal, feel free to poke me if I seem to have lost it after the first
patch reaches my togreg branch.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  No changes in v7.
> 
>  Changes in v6:
>  Fix error in of_property_count_elems_of_size() argumnent:
>  Used ARRAY_SIZE(combined) [4] instead of sizeof(u32).
> 
>  Changes in v5:
>  new, split fixes from changes needed for ACPI support.
> 
>  drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c
> index 394c2afe0f233..289c76bb3b024 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c
> @@ -1213,17 +1213,17 @@ static int sx9310_init_compensation(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>  }
>  
>  static const struct sx9310_reg_default *
> -sx9310_get_default_reg(struct sx9310_data *data, int i,
> +sx9310_get_default_reg(struct sx9310_data *data, int idx,
>  		       struct sx9310_reg_default *reg_def)
>  {
> -	int ret;
>  	const struct device_node *np = data->client->dev.of_node;
> -	u32 combined[SX9310_NUM_CHANNELS] = { 4, 4, 4, 4 };
> +	u32 combined[SX9310_NUM_CHANNELS];
> +	u32 start = 0, raw = 0, pos = 0;
>  	unsigned long comb_mask = 0;
> +	int ret, i, count;
>  	const char *res;
> -	u32 start = 0, raw = 0, pos = 0;
>  
> -	memcpy(reg_def, &sx9310_default_regs[i], sizeof(*reg_def));
> +	memcpy(reg_def, &sx9310_default_regs[idx], sizeof(*reg_def));
>  	if (!np)
>  		return reg_def;
>  
> @@ -1234,15 +1234,31 @@ sx9310_get_default_reg(struct sx9310_data *data, int i,
>  			reg_def->def |= SX9310_REG_PROX_CTRL2_SHIELDEN_GROUND;
>  		}
>  
> -		reg_def->def &= ~SX9310_REG_PROX_CTRL2_COMBMODE_MASK;
> -		of_property_read_u32_array(np, "semtech,combined-sensors",
> -					   combined, ARRAY_SIZE(combined));
> -		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(combined); i++) {
> -			if (combined[i] <= SX9310_NUM_CHANNELS)
> -				comb_mask |= BIT(combined[i]);
> +		count = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "semtech,combined-sensors",
> +							sizeof(u32));
> +		if (count > 0 && count <= ARRAY_SIZE(combined)) {
> +			ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "semtech,combined-sensors",
> +							 combined, count);
> +			if (ret)
> +				break;
> +		} else {
> +			/*
> +			 * Either the property does not exist in the DT or the
> +			 * number of entries is incorrect.
> +			 */
> +			break;
> +		}
> +		for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> +			if (combined[i] >= SX9310_NUM_CHANNELS) {
> +				/* Invalid sensor (invalid DT). */
> +				break;
> +			}
> +			comb_mask |= BIT(combined[i]);
>  		}
> +		if (i < count)
> +			break;
>  
> -		comb_mask &= 0xf;
> +		reg_def->def &= ~SX9310_REG_PROX_CTRL2_COMBMODE_MASK;
>  		if (comb_mask == (BIT(3) | BIT(2) | BIT(1) | BIT(0)))
>  			reg_def->def |= SX9310_REG_PROX_CTRL2_COMBMODE_CS0_CS1_CS2_CS3;
>  		else if (comb_mask == (BIT(1) | BIT(2)))


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-29 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-26 18:46 [PATCH v7 0/2] iio: sx9310: Support ACPI properties Gwendal Grignou
2021-03-26 18:46 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] iio: sx9310: Fix access to variable DT array Gwendal Grignou
2021-03-29 12:18   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2021-03-26 18:46 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] iio: sx9310: Support ACPI properties Gwendal Grignou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210329131831.7eff5058@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=ardeleanalex@gmail.com \
    --cc=campello@chromium.org \
    --cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox