From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio:adc: Drop false comment about lack of timestamp control
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 10:30:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210402103019.75bf89d9@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+U=DsoFoBXAht_1QmROOshXKe=Vh8PBo5HfXj6c2WSn-_Qgpw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 10:25:41 +0300
Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 5:56 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> >
> > The timestamp control has been a function implemented in the core of
> > IIO for a long time, so this comment is incorrect and has clearly been
> > cut and paste into all these drivers.
> >
> > The remainder of the comment added nothing and was confusing so dropped
> > that as well.
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and push out testing for
all the normal reasons.
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> > Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
> > Cc: Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/adc/ad7298.c | 6 ------
> > drivers/iio/adc/ad7887.c | 6 ------
> > drivers/iio/adc/ad7923.c | 6 ------
> > drivers/iio/adc/ad799x.c | 6 ------
> > 4 files changed, 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7298.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7298.c
> > index 689ecd5dd563..d2163cb62f4f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7298.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7298.c
> > @@ -142,12 +142,6 @@ static int ad7298_update_scan_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -/*
> > - * ad7298_trigger_handler() bh of trigger launched polling to ring buffer
> > - *
> > - * Currently there is no option in this driver to disable the saving of
> > - * timestamps within the ring.
> > - */
> > static irqreturn_t ad7298_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
> > {
> > struct iio_poll_func *pf = p;
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7887.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7887.c
> > index 4f6f0e0e03ee..9b3cbe1ddc6f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7887.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7887.c
> > @@ -109,12 +109,6 @@ static int ad7887_ring_postdisable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > return spi_sync(st->spi, &st->msg[AD7887_CH0]);
> > }
> >
> > -/*
> > - * ad7887_trigger_handler() bh of trigger launched polling to ring buffer
> > - *
> > - * Currently there is no option in this driver to disable the saving of
> > - * timestamps within the ring.
> > - **/
> > static irqreturn_t ad7887_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
> > {
> > struct iio_poll_func *pf = p;
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7923.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7923.c
> > index 287f4c13194e..9a649745cd0a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7923.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7923.c
> > @@ -192,12 +192,6 @@ static int ad7923_update_scan_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -/*
> > - * ad7923_trigger_handler() bh of trigger launched polling to ring buffer
> > - *
> > - * Currently there is no option in this driver to disable the saving of
> > - * timestamps within the ring.
> > - */
> > static irqreturn_t ad7923_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
> > {
> > struct iio_poll_func *pf = p;
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad799x.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad799x.c
> > index 1575b7670207..18bf8386d50a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad799x.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad799x.c
> > @@ -182,12 +182,6 @@ static int ad799x_update_config(struct ad799x_state *st, u16 config)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -/*
> > - * ad799x_trigger_handler() bh of trigger launched polling to ring buffer
> > - *
> > - * Currently there is no option in this driver to disable the saving of
> > - * timestamps within the ring.
> > - **/
> > static irqreturn_t ad799x_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
> > {
> > struct iio_poll_func *pf = p;
> > --
> > 2.31.1
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-02 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-01 14:54 [PATCH] iio:adc: Drop false comment about lack of timestamp control Jonathan Cameron
2021-04-02 7:25 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-04-02 9:30 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210402103019.75bf89d9@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=ardeleanalex@gmail.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).