From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B276C433EF for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2022 16:33:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236021AbiAIQdW (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jan 2022 11:33:22 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50442 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236020AbiAIQdW (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jan 2022 11:33:22 -0500 Received: from balrog.mythic-beasts.com (balrog.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:0:2:1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50BC4C06173F for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2022 08:33:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [81.101.6.87] (port=35374 helo=jic23-huawei) by balrog.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1n6b88-000096-BV; Sun, 09 Jan 2022 16:33:20 +0000 Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2022 16:39:14 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Gwendal Grignou , Lars-Peter Clausen , linux-iio , Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/5] iio: proximity: Add SX9324 support Message-ID: <20220109163903.7c368fb2@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: References: <20220101203817.290512-1-gwendal@chromium.org> <20220101203817.290512-4-gwendal@chromium.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 4 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:25:35 +0200 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sun, Jan 2, 2022 at 6:28 PM Gwendal Grignou wrote: > > > > Semtech SAR sensor SX9324 is an evolution of the SX9310: > > It has 4 phases that can be configure to capture and process data > > configured Fixed up. > > > from any of 3 CS pins and provide independent detection: > > proximity, table proximity or body proximity. > > ... > > > +static const struct acpi_device_id sx9324_acpi_match[] = { > > + { "STH9324", SX9324_WHOAMI_VALUE }, > > So I believe this one is allocated by SEMTECH. Can you confirm? > This one seemed highly plausible, but indeed good to have it actually stated that they'd allocated the ID. > > + { } > > +}; > > ... > > > +static const struct i2c_device_id sx9324_id[] = { > > + {"sx9324", SX9324_WHOAMI_VALUE }, > > Missed space. Fixed up. > > > + { } > > +}; > Jonathan