From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0154C433F5 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 19:07:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234765AbiAVTH4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2022 14:07:56 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55770 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229472AbiAVTHz (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2022 14:07:55 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0D34C06173B for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 11:07:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA86160E8F for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 19:07:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC760C004E1; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 19:07:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1642878474; bh=qz/XSsmq6dyVDD1/12oulEBz5kWq530icoJ5F1KDIAk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=q9XXS2VY15ZxwWLTiUCnmZtX5pojwbDOX/3VxupFUbAlIYMvfVzro4E2OTNbsXKW4 gQvzWtD9/7qAHloLySuSO/mAcNHURVEcYs1SPeUFmJZ5mD7aGTaxCtT2W0ivpVxfg0 8cQBmrvZwzCN5t10MVeZU/X8KfoH96z1uaMfqEsbV6MKhGYk7+VDtrhmV0lLud1zO/ hzkztgSWYdK05UhPf4/A3mqezXngKmznUmo/uU5izAfGJazScNUk/ZUKXFb0EGw8yu IwBmFBvqzwveTqzfPfb+OHhW6R+7cOVfRP0mRK/Legd3AMn/2AB1BWBT3ngwSMA/HU jF1Q/GwihZksg== Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 19:14:03 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Gwendal Grignou , jongpil19.jung@samsung.com, Lars-Peter Clausen , linux-iio Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: sx9360: enable push iio event Message-ID: <20220122191403.22364523@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: References: <20220118212504.832429-1-gwendal@chromium.org> <20220122172940.125d8033@jic23-huawei> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 20:15:57 +0200 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 7:23 PM Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 13:25:04 -0800 > > Gwendal Grignou wrote: > > ... > > > > Fixes: f75095753 ("iio:proximity:sx9360: Add sx9360 support") > > This is part of the tag block so should appear. > > > > fixes tag should be here. > > > Signed-off-by: Jongpil Jung > > > Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou > > ...and the submitter's SoB must be last (according to the documentation). > Hi Andy, If it's a handling chain, rather that about co development etc then I'd expect it to be in this order to indicate that Gwendal was on the route to upstream. "Any further SoBs (Signed-off-by:'s) following the author's SoB are from people handling and transporting the patch, but were not involved in its development. SoB chains should reflect the **real** route a patch took as it was propagated to the maintainers and ultimately to Linus, with the first SoB entry signalling primary authorship of a single author." Jonathan From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04C0C433EF for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 19:08:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229472AbiAVTIP (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2022 14:08:15 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]:36752 "EHLO dfw.source.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234766AbiAVTIP (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2022 14:08:15 -0500 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D548B60EAE for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 19:08:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9162C004E1; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 19:08:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1642878494; bh=qz/XSsmq6dyVDD1/12oulEBz5kWq530icoJ5F1KDIAk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Sbc5VZRdmPc5Hp00oV4i2OeueYEhgde4RbDLVfIayC8gvosHwAbFUELSK56awNN29 f9GgqU9uQXHoV1ZAB6KW0QQwywf87VNxOy3RP8+tNweXlUHpUiOr7UMzxCHJyaP23+ +a3MKcZ6s/JK+5IkL7zhJjBvCl5qNPNEr+guX+k37AyPQdfodi7HLzs/vRvrFoPGRe n8hWG0syJ3fog97UYd/j3Xb/Qzzza1BkXlQFY8buwsKKILm9BSp9Ra5zVutBTxt5J2 ZXdsBgxlNmsznxLwKPLOvErzsQUMw4brKX+Saum46cfD8NdjLcKSXoyoK3JPehDjI1 Slo9QvRa3FGTA== Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 19:14:24 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Gwendal Grignou , jongpil19.jung@samsung.com, Lars-Peter Clausen , linux-iio Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: sx9360: enable push iio event Message-ID: <20220122191403.22364523@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: References: <20220118212504.832429-1-gwendal@chromium.org> <20220122172940.125d8033@jic23-huawei> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20220122191424.MnB4bxgB5nDgLMdcSqPLlOU5pw3q_SCm72O48RvrSfA@z> On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 20:15:57 +0200 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 7:23 PM Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 13:25:04 -0800 > > Gwendal Grignou wrote: > > ... > > > > Fixes: f75095753 ("iio:proximity:sx9360: Add sx9360 support") > > This is part of the tag block so should appear. > > > > fixes tag should be here. > > > Signed-off-by: Jongpil Jung > > > Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou > > ...and the submitter's SoB must be last (according to the documentation). > Hi Andy, If it's a handling chain, rather that about co development etc then I'd expect it to be in this order to indicate that Gwendal was on the route to upstream. "Any further SoBs (Signed-off-by:'s) following the author's SoB are from people handling and transporting the patch, but were not involved in its development. SoB chains should reflect the **real** route a patch took as it was propagated to the maintainers and ultimately to Linus, with the first SoB entry signalling primary authorship of a single author." Jonathan