From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Brian Johannesmeyer" <bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com>,
Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@vu.nl>,
"Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@vu.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: buffer: remove usage of list iterator variable for list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse()
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 16:37:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220402163645.17e911fd@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220331230632.957634-1-jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 01:06:30 +0200
Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com> wrote:
> In preparation to limit the scope of the list iterator variable to the
> list traversal loop, use a dedicated pointer to iterate through the
> list [1].
>
> Since that variable should not be used past the loop iteration, a
> separate variable is used to 'remember the current location within the
> loop'.
>
> To either continue iterating from that position or start a new
> iteration (if the previous iteration was complete) list_prepare_entry()
> is used.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/ [1]
> Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Hi Jakob,
Series applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing to let
0-day take a poke at it. Note I'll be rebasing that branch on rc1 once available
before pushing it out for linux-next to pick up.
Note I'm happy to add additional tags if anyone else takes a look at it.
Thanks
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> index 208b5193c621..151a77c2affd 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> @@ -1059,7 +1059,7 @@ static int iio_enable_buffers(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> struct iio_device_config *config)
> {
> struct iio_dev_opaque *iio_dev_opaque = to_iio_dev_opaque(indio_dev);
> - struct iio_buffer *buffer;
> + struct iio_buffer *buffer, *tmp = NULL;
> int ret;
>
> indio_dev->active_scan_mask = config->scan_mask;
> @@ -1097,8 +1097,10 @@ static int iio_enable_buffers(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>
> list_for_each_entry(buffer, &iio_dev_opaque->buffer_list, buffer_list) {
> ret = iio_buffer_enable(buffer, indio_dev);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> + tmp = buffer;
> goto err_disable_buffers;
> + }
> }
>
> if (indio_dev->currentmode == INDIO_BUFFER_TRIGGERED) {
> @@ -1125,6 +1127,7 @@ static int iio_enable_buffers(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> indio_dev->pollfunc);
> }
> err_disable_buffers:
> + buffer = list_prepare_entry(tmp, &iio_dev_opaque->buffer_list, buffer_list);
> list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(buffer, &iio_dev_opaque->buffer_list,
> buffer_list)
> iio_buffer_disable(buffer, indio_dev);
>
> base-commit: f82da161ea75dc4db21b2499e4b1facd36dab275
> --
> 2.25.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-02 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-31 23:06 [PATCH 1/3] iio: buffer: remove usage of list iterator variable for list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse() Jakob Koschel
2022-03-31 23:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] iio: ssp_sensors: replace usage of found with dedicated list iterator variable Jakob Koschel
2022-04-01 12:43 ` Sa, Nuno
2022-03-31 23:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] iio: sysfs-trigger: " Jakob Koschel
2022-04-01 12:41 ` Sa, Nuno
2022-04-01 12:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] iio: buffer: remove usage of list iterator variable for list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse() Sa, Nuno
2022-04-01 13:55 ` Jakob Koschel
2022-04-01 14:28 ` Sa, Nuno
2022-04-02 15:37 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220402163645.17e911fd@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com \
--cc=c.giuffrida@vu.nl \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=h.j.bos@vu.nl \
--cc=jakobkoschel@gmail.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox