Linux IIO development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@hugovil.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com, lars@metafoo.de, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] iio: adc: Kconfig: add SPI interface mention to AD7924 description
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 13:52:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221223135209.f46617b6f23ff9b60a85ebe7@hugovil.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221223141232.0f570f33@jic23-huawei>

On Fri, 23 Dec 2022 14:12:32 +0000
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 15:36:08 -0500
> Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@hugovil.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com>
> > 
> > The Analog Devices AD7924 uses an SPI interface. There is also a Texas
> > Instruments ADS7924 which uses an I2C interface.
> > 
> > Adding the SPI mention to the AD7924 will help to avoid confusion
> > between the two chips.
> Hi Hugo,
> 
> Welcome to IIO.
> 
> I don't really mind this, but given they have different part numbers
> and the similarly named TI part could just have easily been SPI
> I'm not sure the clarification is really useful.
> 
> Also, under all the circumstances I can think of, if you can see the
> help text you can also see the SPI dependence clearly listed.
> 
> Hence I think is just noise, though I'm guessing it reflects a
> confusion you ran into!
> 
> Jonathan

Hi Jonathan,
yes, I initially tought that the TI ADS7924 was already supported because of the AD7924 entry. I wrongly assumed that the parts were similar and TI just renamed it because they bought Analog Devices. I am pretty sure that I am not the only one having made a similar error :)

Of course, both chips differ not only because of their interface (SPI vs I2C), but also in their modes of operation and registers, interrupt pin presence (ADS7924), etc.

But I can drop this patch if you want.

Hugo V.



> > Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig b/drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig
> > index 46c4fc2fc534..235319546974 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig
> > @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ config AD7923
> >  	select IIO_TRIGGERED_BUFFER
> >  	help
> >  	  Say yes here to build support for Analog Devices
> > -	  AD7904, AD7914, AD7923, AD7924 4 Channel ADCs.
> > +	  AD7904, AD7914, AD7923, AD7924 4 Channel SPI ADCs.
> >  
> >  	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
> >  	  module will be called ad7923.
> 
> 


-- 
Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@hugovil.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-23 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-22 20:36 [PATCH v1 0/3] iio: adc: ti-ads7924: add ADS7924 driver Hugo Villeneuve
2022-12-22 20:36 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] iio: adc: Kconfig: add SPI interface mention to AD7924 description Hugo Villeneuve
2022-12-23 14:12   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-12-23 18:52     ` Hugo Villeneuve [this message]
2022-12-30 18:03       ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-12-22 20:36 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] iio: adc: ti-ads7924: add ADS7924 driver Hugo Villeneuve
2022-12-23 14:47   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-10 15:38     ` Hugo Villeneuve
2022-12-22 20:36 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] dt-bindings: iio: adc: add ADS7924 Hugo Villeneuve
2022-12-23  8:19   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-12-23 14:09     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-12-23 17:56       ` Hugo Villeneuve
2022-12-23 14:50   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-12-23 19:24     ` Hugo Villeneuve

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221223135209.f46617b6f23ff9b60a85ebe7@hugovil.com \
    --to=hugo@hugovil.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox