Linux IIO development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: carlos.song@nxp.com
Cc: lars@metafoo.de, rjones@gateworks.com,
	Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, haibo.chen@nxp.com,
	linux-imx@nxp.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] iio: imu: fxos8700: improve readability by field mask and regmap_write
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 16:59:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221223165953.19fc0081@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221214031503.3104251-3-carlos.song@nxp.com>

On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 11:15:00 +0800
carlos.song@nxp.com wrote:

> From: Carlos Song <carlos.song@nxp.com>
> 
> FXOS8700_CTRL_ODR_MSK is a hex digit mask and FXOS8700_CTRL_ODR_GENMSK
> is a field mask. They have a similar function. And mixing regmap_write
> and regmap_update_bits isn't good for readability.
> 
> Remove FXOS8700_CTRL_ODR_GENMSK and set FXOS8700_CTRL_ODR_MSK a field
> mask definition with a synchronous change. Use regmap_write() instead
> of regmap_update_bits() to update bits. They are good for readability.
> 
> Fixes: 84e5ddd5c46e ("iio: imu: Add support for the FXOS8700 IMU")
Needs a comment on why this deserves a fixes tag.

> Signed-off-by: Carlos Song <carlos.song@nxp.com>
> 
---

needed here.

> Changes for V3:
> - Remove FXOS8700_CTRL_ODR_GENMSK and set FXOS8700_CTRL_ODR_MSK a
>   field mask.
> - Legal use of filed mask and FIELD_PREP() to select ODR mode
> - Rework commit log
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/fxos8700_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/fxos8700_core.c
> index 83ab7d0f79b3..a1af5d0fde5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/fxos8700_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/fxos8700_core.c
> @@ -145,10 +145,9 @@
>  #define FXOS8700_NVM_DATA_BNK0      0xa7
>  
>  /* Bit definitions for FXOS8700_CTRL_REG1 */
> -#define FXOS8700_CTRL_ODR_MSK       0x38
>  #define FXOS8700_CTRL_ODR_MAX       0x00
>  #define FXOS8700_CTRL_ODR_MIN       GENMASK(4, 3)
> -#define FXOS8700_CTRL_ODR_GENMSK    GENMASK(5, 3)
> +#define FXOS8700_CTRL_ODR_MSK       GENMASK(5, 3)

Why jump through this loop in patch 1 and then this?  Just use
ODR_MSK in that fix in the first place. Doesn't matter for
purposes of a fix that it is in a less than ideal form.

>  
>  /* Bit definitions for FXOS8700_M_CTRL_REG1 */
>  #define FXOS8700_HMS_MASK           GENMASK(1, 0)
> @@ -510,10 +509,8 @@ static int fxos8700_set_odr(struct fxos8700_data *data, enum fxos8700_sensor t,
>  	if (i >= odr_num)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	return regmap_update_bits(data->regmap,
> -				  FXOS8700_CTRL_REG1,
> -				  FXOS8700_CTRL_ODR_MSK + FXOS8700_ACTIVE,
> -				  fxos8700_odr[i].bits << 3 | active_mode);
> +	val = val | FIELD_PREP(FXOS8700_CTRL_ODR_MSK, fxos8700_odr[i].bits) | active_mode;
> +	return regmap_write(data->regmap, FXOS8700_CTRL_REG1, val);
>  }
>  
>  static int fxos8700_get_odr(struct fxos8700_data *data, enum fxos8700_sensor t,
> @@ -526,7 +523,7 @@ static int fxos8700_get_odr(struct fxos8700_data *data, enum fxos8700_sensor t,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	val = FIELD_GET(FXOS8700_CTRL_ODR_GENMSK, val);
> +	val = FIELD_GET(FXOS8700_CTRL_ODR_MSK, val);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < odr_num; i++)
>  		if (val == fxos8700_odr[i].bits)


  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-23 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-14  3:14 [PATCH v3 0/5] iio: imu: fxos8700: fix bugs about ODR and changes for a good readability carlos.song
2022-12-14  3:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] iio: imu: fxos8700: fix incorrect ODR mode readback carlos.song
2022-12-23 16:55   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-12-23 16:58     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-12-14  3:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] iio: imu: fxos8700: improve readability by field mask and regmap_write carlos.song
2022-12-23 16:59   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2022-12-14  3:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] iio: imu: fxos8700: fix failed initialization ODR mode assignment carlos.song
2022-12-14  3:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] iio: imu: fxos8700: remove definition FXOS8700_CTRL_ODR_MIN carlos.song
2022-12-14  3:15 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] iio: imu: fxos8700: fix MAGN sensor scale and unit carlos.song
2022-12-23 17:01   ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221223165953.19fc0081@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=carlos.song@nxp.com \
    --cc=haibo.chen@nxp.com \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=rjones@gateworks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox