From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@linaro.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] iio: addac: stx104: Fix race condition for stx104_write_raw()
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 17:51:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230407175147.180f9f44@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c95c9a77fcef36b2a052282146950f23bbc1ebdc.1680790580.git.william.gray@linaro.org>
On Thu, 6 Apr 2023 10:40:10 -0400
William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@linaro.org> wrote:
> The priv->chan_out_states array and actual DAC value can become
> mismatched if stx104_write_raw() is called concurrently. Prevent such a
> race condition by utilizing a mutex.
>
> Fixes: 97a445dad37a ("iio: Add IIO support for the DAC on the Apex Embedded Systems STX104")
> Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@linaro.org>
Marked these first two patches for stable as probably worth a backport
even if no one notices the affect of the race. I'll queue them for the
next merge window though as we are fairly late in this cycle and I don't
want to delay the 4 patches that follow a whole cycle.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> Changes in v5: none
>
> drivers/iio/addac/stx104.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/addac/stx104.c b/drivers/iio/addac/stx104.c
> index e45b70aa5bb7..4239aafe42fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/addac/stx104.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/addac/stx104.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
>
> @@ -69,10 +70,12 @@ struct stx104_reg {
>
> /**
> * struct stx104_iio - IIO device private data structure
> + * @lock: synchronization lock to prevent I/O race conditions
> * @chan_out_states: channels' output states
> * @reg: I/O address offset for the device registers
> */
> struct stx104_iio {
> + struct mutex lock;
> unsigned int chan_out_states[STX104_NUM_OUT_CHAN];
> struct stx104_reg __iomem *reg;
> };
> @@ -178,9 +181,12 @@ static int stx104_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> if ((unsigned int)val > 65535)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
> +
> priv->chan_out_states[chan->channel] = val;
> iowrite16(val, &priv->reg->dac[chan->channel]);
>
> + mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
> return 0;
> }
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -351,6 +357,8 @@ static int stx104_probe(struct device *dev, unsigned int id)
>
> indio_dev->name = dev_name(dev);
>
> + mutex_init(&priv->lock);
> +
> /* configure device for software trigger operation */
> iowrite8(0, &priv->reg->acr);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-07 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-06 14:40 [PATCH v5 0/6] Migrate STX104 to the regmap API William Breathitt Gray
2023-04-06 14:40 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] iio: addac: stx104: Fix race condition for stx104_write_raw() William Breathitt Gray
2023-04-07 16:51 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2023-04-06 14:40 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] iio: addac: stx104: Fix race condition when converting analog-to-digital William Breathitt Gray
2023-04-06 14:40 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] iio: addac: stx104: Use define rather than hardcoded limit for write val William Breathitt Gray
2023-04-06 14:40 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] iio: addac: stx104: Improve indentation in stx104_write_raw() William Breathitt Gray
2023-04-06 14:40 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] iio: addac: stx104: Migrate to the regmap API William Breathitt Gray
2023-04-06 14:40 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] iio: addac: stx104: Use regmap_read_poll_timeout() for conversion poll William Breathitt Gray
2023-04-07 16:49 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] Migrate STX104 to the regmap API Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230407175147.180f9f44@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=william.gray@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox