From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224B0C77B61 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 11:19:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229644AbjDJLS7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2023 07:18:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37008 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229571AbjDJLS6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2023 07:18:58 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26AF02D69; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 04:18:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3A8560FEF; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 11:18:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2DD9BC4339B; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 11:18:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1681125536; bh=SVRaPmsADY+kGtCmqrnVbpIWM5lv7xkVCJpqPdGwPAI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=uPaHE+Yp9a7HbS+W7jmVFEem3AbNgtgbI14lmFtAvkLHLvHxFxpjSw1v1Z+eDk74V 8HdU81tjMs3dqG7V0h6D+qznGgWcYQOpkP9+zFjlg/I9MntURTPnmA2ZJqJk1gyBCh BAi5kOlTDd4kqZ0y/Lh6lOLgTB1rA05jTlfsP8BzkpetC8tuCkVY4iITiG1FWczJhq itGBU/cfkIIlVgumNmUaP91Wk9wO48pvKyYDt8YH/3Ou3TcmSYCGoYFEbHSpn3OMPd Y6gyU66CJRMJ/9vFwsIwDJPwYwjY59ogCN9bTcGYTPTgkyrhVbL/SzUIXuM2DcfyWd 8lTgZ5sOjxSig== Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 12:34:13 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Matti Vaittinen Cc: Matti Vaittinen , Andrea Merello , Jonathan Cameron , Lars-Peter Clausen , Andy Shevchenko , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jagath Jog J Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] Improve kernel docs Message-ID: <20230410123413.0bbd39d3@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: References: <20230408104938.74a36f7a@jic23-huawei> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.37; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 13:16:22 +0300 Matti Vaittinen wrote: > la 8. huhtik. 2023 klo 12.34 Jonathan Cameron (jic23@kernel.org) kirjoitti: > > > > On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 15:24:15 +0300 > > Matti Vaittinen wrote: > > > > > IIO has very nice facilities for efficiently providing data from a > > > device to user (and probably also vice-versa - but I've not used that > > > direction). Getting started with IIO may not be so simple though - some > > > of the concepts like triggers and buffers are quite unique. > > > > > > This series tries to make it easier for a newcomer to write his/her first > > > IIO driver by adding some documentation to used enums. Series does not > > > provide extensive documentation but just documents those few entries I > > > have become familiar with - but it still aims to be a starting point for > > > others to add missing bits and pieces. > > > > > > This series is marked as v2 because the patch 1 was previously sent as a > > > stan-alone RFC to collect the missing channel units. RFC can be seen > > > here: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/10a855f9adc1d710150b7f647500c3c6a769f9ca.1677243698.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com/ > > > > > > Patches 2 and 3 were added as a result of discussion followed by the > > > RFC. > > > > Something odd happened on this resend. Patch 1 didn't make it to me > > or patchwork. I'll reply to previous posting instead. > > > > It seems checkpatch.pl + some of the patches were only picking the > huawei.com address. Maybe that is the reason? Nope. Patchwork gets it straight from the list and b4 gets it it from lore.kernel.org which is also missing patch 1. > > This really was a resend with no changes other than rebasing it - > hence reviewing the v2 was absolutely fine. Thanks for the review! > I'll check the suggestions and send v3 later this week. Great. I'm behind with a few other discussions including the looking at your questions around that color sensor you want support. So may be a while before I circle back round to this anyway! Jonathan > > Yours, > -- Matti