From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Masahiro Honda <honda@mechatrax.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Fix IRQ issue by setting IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY flag
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2023 12:15:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230423121528.259d3cd4@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230420102316.757-1-honda@mechatrax.com>
On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 19:23:16 +0900
Masahiro Honda <honda@mechatrax.com> wrote:
> The Sigma-Delta ADCs supported by this driver can use SDO as an interrupt
> line to indicate the completion of a conversion. However, some devices
> cannot properly detect the completion of a conversion by an interrupt.
> This is for the reason mentioned in the following commit.
>
> commit e9849777d0e2 ("genirq: Add flag to force mask in
> disable_irq[_nosync]()")
>
> A read operation is performed by an extra interrupt before the completion
> of a conversion. This patch fixes the issue by setting IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY
> flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Honda <honda@mechatrax.com>
> ---
> v3:
> - Remove the Kconfig option.
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20230414102744.150-1-honda@mechatrax.com/
> - Rework commit message.
> - Add a new entry in the Kconfig.
> - Call irq_clear_status_flags(irq, IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY) when freeing the IRQ.
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20230306044737.862-1-honda@mechatrax.com/
>
> drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c
> index d8570f620..215ecbedb 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c
> @@ -565,6 +565,14 @@ int ad_sd_validate_trigger(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, struct iio_trigger *trig)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(ad_sd_validate_trigger, IIO_AD_SIGMA_DELTA);
>
> +static void ad_sd_free_irq(void *sd)
> +{
> + struct ad_sigma_delta *sigma_delta = sd;
> +
> + irq_clear_status_flags(sigma_delta->spi->irq, IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY);
> + free_irq(sigma_delta->spi->irq, sigma_delta);
> +}
Don't fuse the two operations unwinding like this. Just register a callback that only
does the irq_clear_status_flags immediately after setting them. Then leave
the orginally devm_request_irq call alone. If it fails, the devm cleanup will
deal with the irq_clear_status_flag for you.
It almost never makes sense for a single devm call to unwind more than one function call in
a driver.
Otherwise this looks fine to me,
Thanks,
Jonathan
> +
> static int devm_ad_sd_probe_trigger(struct device *dev, struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> {
> struct ad_sigma_delta *sigma_delta = iio_device_get_drvdata(indio_dev);
> @@ -584,11 +592,18 @@ static int devm_ad_sd_probe_trigger(struct device *dev, struct iio_dev *indio_de
> init_completion(&sigma_delta->completion);
>
> sigma_delta->irq_dis = true;
> - ret = devm_request_irq(dev, sigma_delta->spi->irq,
> - ad_sd_data_rdy_trig_poll,
> - sigma_delta->info->irq_flags | IRQF_NO_AUTOEN,
> - indio_dev->name,
> - sigma_delta);
> + irq_set_status_flags(sigma_delta->spi->irq, IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY);
> + ret = request_irq(sigma_delta->spi->irq,
> + ad_sd_data_rdy_trig_poll,
> + sigma_delta->info->irq_flags | IRQF_NO_AUTOEN,
> + indio_dev->name,
> + sigma_delta);
> + if (ret) {
> + irq_clear_status_flags(sigma_delta->spi->irq, IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, ad_sd_free_irq, sigma_delta);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-23 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-20 10:23 [PATCH v3] Fix IRQ issue by setting IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY flag Masahiro Honda
2023-04-21 8:58 ` Nuno Sá
2023-04-23 11:15 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2023-04-24 9:09 ` Nuno Sá
2023-04-30 17:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-01 10:45 ` Masahiro Honda
2023-04-26 12:02 ` Masahiro Honda
2023-04-26 14:17 ` Masahiro Honda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230423121528.259d3cd4@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=honda@mechatrax.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox