From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Sanity-check available_scan_masks array
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2023 16:55:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231021165535.34dcb94b@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1697452986.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 14:04:11 +0300
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sanity-check available_scan_masks array
>
> The available_scan_masks is an array of bitmasks representing the
> channels which can be simultaneously(*) scanned by a driver from the
> device. Following special characteristics apply:
>
> - When IIO is scanning through the array it will use the first mask
> which can be used to scan all enabled channels. This means drivers
> should order the array in the order of the preference. This does also
> mean that a mask which is a subset of a mask located earler in array
> will never be used because the earlier one will be picked by the core.
> - Masks wider than size of long are supported only to some extent. The
> code scanning through the array will interpret the first mask with
> first long zeroed as end-of-array terminator. Changing this behaviour
> would make mask-arrays for multi-long masks to be terminated by more
> than one zero long. Failure to do so would result kernel to read
> beyond the array generating a potentially hazardous bug.
>
> Add a sanity-check to IIO-device registration emitting a warning if
> available_scan_mask array is misordered or if mask width is larger than
> a long while available_scan_mask-array is populated. Currently there
> should be no in-tree drivers with available_scan_mask populated and mask
> wider than a long.
>
> Revision history:
> v1 => v2:
> - Add patch 2/2 documenting why iio_scan_mask_match() checks only
> a long worth of bits while searching for the end of the
> available_scan_mask-array.
> - Styling of patch 1/2 as per comments from Jonathan
> v1 and related discussion here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZRvjuZaQWdZw1U1I@dc78bmyyyyyyyyyyyyydt-3.rev.dnainternet.fi/
>
> Matti Vaittinen (2):
> iio: sanity check available_scan_masks array
> iio: buffer: document known issue
>
> drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 16 ++++++++
> drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
>
Hi Matti,
Just a quick note to say this looks fine to me, but I don't want to queue it up
just yet given proximity to merge window etc. I'll aim to pick it up early
in next cycle. Give me a poke if I still haven't by rc3 or so.
Thanks,
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-21 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-16 11:04 [PATCH v2 0/2] Sanity-check available_scan_masks array Matti Vaittinen
2023-10-16 11:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: sanity check " Matti Vaittinen
2023-10-16 11:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: buffer: document known issue Matti Vaittinen
2023-10-21 15:55 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2023-10-21 16:03 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Sanity-check available_scan_masks array Matti Vaittinen
2023-10-28 16:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-29 15:28 ` Matti Vaittinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231021165535.34dcb94b@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com \
--cc=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox