From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E4AE249ED; Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:26:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="MyhnU/Jh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FA0EC433C7; Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:26:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1701696393; bh=+KG3xcZFmyTIbsERfnkP9uoq6hpeNKXxUGzii+pc5Zo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MyhnU/JhrifVCtFAvZAaYK6Y9cw5Vffz3K+2EC9PP5lRzheWG2PAp4XgT2kLwsdth qYXPaixNhYL6tMgiJg2PZm9IN9rXzOK7DLy1Pa7gn+kcCZTeU7CMDC3y06FrduxrlJ Tw2BdGbxlPgbjXLP2ecMpyKHaAIb7SRbHGgaOoxb10e13M7g0aETR0KR+y6/EV3AlV imj55cWAPTTfDkUaReH3tVJiaLVmdUsO85vhrc5G6sxWQGanKlbS32pFs41KaSVmH9 wLFi6CNym5n3Puk5H4LvFJYwPFMwKDCPFOSxt0piuHwjKpMIdiT+SxNlL3VAv3ovG6 E2IJ2r99vayAQ== Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:26:24 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Johan Hovold Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi: fix up examples Message-ID: <20231204132624.03733d50@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: <20231130171628.12257-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org> References: <20231130171628.12257-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 18:16:22 +0100 Johan Hovold wrote: > When reviewing the various SPMI PMIC bindings, I noticed that several > examples were incorrect and misleading and could also use some cleanup. > > This series addresses the iio/adc ones. All look fine to me. Just waiting for the DT folk to have time to take a look. > > Johan > > > Johan Hovold (6): > dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-iadc: fix reg description > dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-iadc: fix example node name > dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-iadc: clean up example > dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-rradc: clean up example > dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-vadc: fix example node names > dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-vadc: clean up examples > > .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-iadc.yaml | 10 ++++++---- > .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-rradc.yaml | 4 ++-- > .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-vadc.yaml | 9 +++++---- > 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >