Linux IIO development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Nuno Sa via B4 Relay <devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com@kernel.org>
Cc: <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] iio: adc: ad9467: fix reset gpio handling
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 18:03:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231206180317.5f298685@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231205-iio-backend-prep-v1-1-7c9bc18d612b@analog.com>

On Tue, 05 Dec 2023 18:06:41 +0100
Nuno Sa via B4 Relay <devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> 
> The reset gpio was being requested with GPIOD_OUT_LOW which means, not
> asserted. Then it was being asserted but never de-asserted which means
> the devices was left in reset. Fix it by de-asserting the gpio.

If I understand this correctly, it's really just inverted polarity
compared to the expectation?  If so just call it that rather than
discussing what happens in detail.

> 
> While at it, moved the handling to it's own function and dropped
> 'reset_gpio' from the 'struct ad9467_state' as we only need it during
> probe. On top of that, refactored things so that we now request the gpio
> asserted (i.e in reset) and then de-assert it. Also note that we now use
> gpiod_set_value_cansleep() instead of gpiod_direction_output() as we
> already request the pin as output.
> 
> Fixes: ad6797120238 ("iio: adc: ad9467: add support AD9467 ADC")
> Signed-off-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
> index 39eccc28debe..5ecf486bf5d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,6 @@ struct ad9467_state {
>  	unsigned int			output_mode;
>  
>  	struct gpio_desc		*pwrdown_gpio;
> -	struct gpio_desc		*reset_gpio;
>  };
>  
>  static int ad9467_spi_read(struct spi_device *spi, unsigned int reg)
> @@ -378,6 +377,23 @@ static int ad9467_preenable_setup(struct adi_axi_adc_conv *conv)
>  	return ad9467_outputmode_set(st->spi, st->output_mode);
>  }
>  
> +static int ad9467_reset(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct gpio_desc *gpio;
> +
> +	gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> +	if (IS_ERR(gpio))
> +		return PTR_ERR(gpio);
> +	if (!gpio)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	fsleep(1);
> +	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(gpio, 0);
> +	fsleep(10 * USEC_PER_MSEC);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int ad9467_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  {
>  	const struct ad9467_chip_info *info;
> @@ -408,18 +424,9 @@ static int ad9467_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  	if (IS_ERR(st->pwrdown_gpio))
>  		return PTR_ERR(st->pwrdown_gpio);
>  
> -	st->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&spi->dev, "reset",
> -						 GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> -	if (IS_ERR(st->reset_gpio))
> -		return PTR_ERR(st->reset_gpio);
> -
> -	if (st->reset_gpio) {
> -		udelay(1);
> -		ret = gpiod_direction_output(st->reset_gpio, 1);
> -		if (ret)
> -			return ret;
> -		mdelay(10);
> -	}
> +	ret = ad9467_reset(&spi->dev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
>  
>  	conv->chip_info = &info->axi_adc_info;
>  
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-06 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-05 17:06 [PATCH 0/8] iio: ad9467 and axi-adc cleanups Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2023-12-05 17:06 ` [PATCH 1/8] iio: adc: ad9467: fix reset gpio handling Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2023-12-06 18:03   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2023-12-07  9:02     ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-06 22:09   ` David Lechner
2023-12-07  9:04     ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-05 17:06 ` [PATCH 2/8] iio: adc: ad9467: don't ignore error codes Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2023-12-06 22:14   ` David Lechner
2023-12-05 17:06 ` [PATCH 3/8] iio: adc: ad9467: add mutex to struct ad9467_state Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2023-12-06 22:27   ` David Lechner
2023-12-07  9:10     ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-05 17:06 ` [PATCH 4/8] iio: adc: ad9467: fix scale setting Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2023-12-06 23:01   ` David Lechner
2023-12-07  9:21     ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-07 10:02     ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-10 11:27       ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-11  9:32         ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-05 17:06 ` [PATCH 5/8] iio: adc: ad9467: use spi_get_device_match_data() Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2023-12-06 23:03   ` David Lechner
2023-12-05 17:06 ` [PATCH 6/8] iio: adc: ad9467: use chip_info variables instead of array Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2023-12-06 23:10   ` David Lechner
2023-12-05 17:06 ` [PATCH 7/8] iio: adc: ad9467: use the more common !val NULL check Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2023-12-06 23:11   ` David Lechner
2023-12-05 17:06 ` [PATCH 8/8] iio: adc: adi-axi-adc: convert to regmap Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2023-12-06 18:05   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-06 23:18   ` David Lechner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231206180317.5f298685@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox