From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 06/10] iio: proximity: sx9360: Use automated cleanup for locks and IIO mode claiming.
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2023 17:35:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231217173548.112701-7-jic23@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231217173548.112701-1-jic23@kernel.org>
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
This simplifies error handling paths and generallly removes a bunch
of boilerplate.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
---
drivers/iio/proximity/sx9360.c | 111 +++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9360.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9360.c
index 2c4e14a4fe9f..3f894c276e25 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9360.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9360.c
@@ -322,25 +322,16 @@ static int sx9360_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
int *val, int *val2, long mask)
{
struct sx_common_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
- int ret;
switch (mask) {
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
- ret = iio_device_claim_direct_mode(indio_dev);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- ret = sx_common_read_proximity(data, chan, val);
- iio_device_release_direct_mode(indio_dev);
- return ret;
+ iio_device_claim_direct_scoped(return -EBUSY, indio_dev)
+ return sx_common_read_proximity(data, chan, val);
+ return -EINVAL;
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_HARDWAREGAIN:
- ret = iio_device_claim_direct_mode(indio_dev);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- ret = sx9360_read_gain(data, chan, val);
- iio_device_release_direct_mode(indio_dev);
- return ret;
+ iio_device_claim_direct_scoped(return -EBUSY, indio_dev)
+ return sx9360_read_gain(data, chan, val);
+ return -EINVAL;
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
return sx9360_read_samp_freq(data, val, val2);
default:
@@ -387,19 +378,15 @@ static int sx9360_read_avail(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
static int sx9360_set_samp_freq(struct sx_common_data *data,
int val, int val2)
{
- int ret, reg;
+ int reg;
__be16 buf;
reg = val * 8192 / SX9360_FOSC_HZ + val2 * 8192 / (SX9360_FOSC_MHZ);
buf = cpu_to_be16(reg);
- mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
-
- ret = regmap_bulk_write(data->regmap, SX9360_REG_GNRL_CTRL1, &buf,
- sizeof(buf));
+ guard(mutex)(&data->mutex);
- mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
-
- return ret;
+ return regmap_bulk_write(data->regmap, SX9360_REG_GNRL_CTRL1, &buf,
+ sizeof(buf));
}
static int sx9360_read_thresh(struct sx_common_data *data, int *val)
@@ -510,7 +497,6 @@ static int sx9360_read_event_val(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
static int sx9360_write_thresh(struct sx_common_data *data, int _val)
{
unsigned int val = _val;
- int ret;
if (val >= 1)
val = int_sqrt(2 * val);
@@ -518,11 +504,8 @@ static int sx9360_write_thresh(struct sx_common_data *data, int _val)
if (val > 0xff)
return -EINVAL;
- mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
- ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, SX9360_REG_PROX_CTRL5, val);
- mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
-
- return ret;
+ guard(mutex)(&data->mutex);
+ return regmap_write(data->regmap, SX9360_REG_PROX_CTRL5, val);
}
static int sx9360_write_hysteresis(struct sx_common_data *data, int _val)
@@ -546,18 +529,14 @@ static int sx9360_write_hysteresis(struct sx_common_data *data, int _val)
return -EINVAL;
hyst = FIELD_PREP(SX9360_REG_PROX_CTRL4_HYST_MASK, hyst);
- mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
- ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, SX9360_REG_PROX_CTRL4,
- SX9360_REG_PROX_CTRL4_HYST_MASK, hyst);
- mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
-
- return ret;
+ guard(mutex)(&data->mutex);
+ return regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, SX9360_REG_PROX_CTRL4,
+ SX9360_REG_PROX_CTRL4_HYST_MASK, hyst);
}
static int sx9360_write_far_debounce(struct sx_common_data *data, int _val)
{
unsigned int regval, val = _val;
- int ret;
if (val > 0)
val = ilog2(val);
@@ -566,19 +545,15 @@ static int sx9360_write_far_debounce(struct sx_common_data *data, int _val)
regval = FIELD_PREP(SX9360_REG_PROX_CTRL4_FAR_DEBOUNCE_MASK, val);
- mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
- ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, SX9360_REG_PROX_CTRL4,
- SX9360_REG_PROX_CTRL4_FAR_DEBOUNCE_MASK,
- regval);
- mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
-
- return ret;
+ guard(mutex)(&data->mutex);
+ return regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, SX9360_REG_PROX_CTRL4,
+ SX9360_REG_PROX_CTRL4_FAR_DEBOUNCE_MASK,
+ regval);
}
static int sx9360_write_close_debounce(struct sx_common_data *data, int _val)
{
unsigned int regval, val = _val;
- int ret;
if (val > 0)
val = ilog2(val);
@@ -587,13 +562,10 @@ static int sx9360_write_close_debounce(struct sx_common_data *data, int _val)
regval = FIELD_PREP(SX9360_REG_PROX_CTRL4_CLOSE_DEBOUNCE_MASK, val);
- mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
- ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, SX9360_REG_PROX_CTRL4,
- SX9360_REG_PROX_CTRL4_CLOSE_DEBOUNCE_MASK,
- regval);
- mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
-
- return ret;
+ guard(mutex)(&data->mutex);
+ return regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, SX9360_REG_PROX_CTRL4,
+ SX9360_REG_PROX_CTRL4_CLOSE_DEBOUNCE_MASK,
+ regval);
}
static int sx9360_write_event_val(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
@@ -630,19 +602,15 @@ static int sx9360_write_gain(struct sx_common_data *data,
const struct iio_chan_spec *chan, int val)
{
unsigned int gain, reg;
- int ret;
gain = ilog2(val);
reg = SX9360_REG_PROX_CTRL0_PHR + chan->channel;
gain = FIELD_PREP(SX9360_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_MASK, gain);
- mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
- ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, reg,
- SX9360_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_MASK,
- gain);
- mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
-
- return ret;
+ guard(mutex)(&data->mutex);
+ return regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, reg,
+ SX9360_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_MASK,
+ gain);
}
static int sx9360_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
@@ -827,21 +795,17 @@ static int sx9360_suspend(struct device *dev)
disable_irq_nosync(data->client->irq);
- mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&data->mutex);
ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, SX9360_REG_GNRL_CTRL0, ®val);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
data->suspend_ctrl =
FIELD_GET(SX9360_REG_GNRL_CTRL0_PHEN_MASK, regval);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto out;
/* Disable all phases, send the device to sleep. */
- ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, SX9360_REG_GNRL_CTRL0, 0);
-
-out:
- mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
- return ret;
+ return regmap_write(data->regmap, SX9360_REG_GNRL_CTRL0, 0);
}
static int sx9360_resume(struct device *dev)
@@ -849,14 +813,13 @@ static int sx9360_resume(struct device *dev)
struct sx_common_data *data = iio_priv(dev_get_drvdata(dev));
int ret;
- mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
- ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, SX9360_REG_GNRL_CTRL0,
- SX9360_REG_GNRL_CTRL0_PHEN_MASK,
+ scoped_guard(mutex, &data->mutex) {
+ ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, SX9360_REG_GNRL_CTRL0,
+ SX9360_REG_GNRL_CTRL0_PHEN_MASK,
data->suspend_ctrl);
- mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
enable_irq(data->client->irq);
return 0;
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-17 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-17 17:35 [RFC PATCH V2 00/10] IIO: Use the new cleanup.h magic Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-17 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] iio: locking: introduce __cleanup() based direct mode claiming infrastructure Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-17 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] iio: dummy: Use automatic lock and direct mode cleanup Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-17 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] iio: accel: adxl367: Use automated cleanup for locks and iio direct mode Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-17 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] iio: imu: bmi323: Use cleanup handling for iio_device_claim_direct_mode() Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-17 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] iio: adc: max1363: Use automatic cleanup for locks and iio mode claiming Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-17 17:35 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2023-12-17 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] iio: proximity: sx9324: Use automated cleanup for locks and IIO " Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-17 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] iio: proximity: sx9310: " Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-17 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] iio: adc: ad4130: Use automatic cleanup of locks and direct mode Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-17 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] iio: adc: ad7091r-base: Use auto cleanup of locks Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-18 1:10 ` [RFC PATCH V2 00/10] IIO: Use the new cleanup.h magic David Lechner
2024-01-14 17:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-01-14 17:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-01-15 15:49 ` David Lechner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231217173548.112701-7-jic23@kernel.org \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox