[PATCH 24/24] iio: adc: ti-adc109s102: drop ACPI_PTR() and CONFIG_ACPI guards

[Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>]

From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The complexity of config guards needed for ACPI_PTR() is not worthwhile
for the small amount of saved data. This example was doing it correctly
but I am proposing dropping this so as to reduce chance of cut and paste
where it is done wrong.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc108s102.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc108s102.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc108s102.c
index c82a161630e1..69fcbbc7e418 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc108s102.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc108s102.c
@@ -293,13 +293,11 @@ static const struct of_device_id adc108s102_of_match[] = {
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, adc108s102_of_match);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
 static const struct acpi_device_id adc108s102_acpi_ids[] = {
 	{ "INT3495", 0 },
 	{ }
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, adc108s102_acpi_ids);
-#endif
 
 static const struct spi_device_id adc108s102_id[] = {
 	{ "adc108s102", 0 },
@@ -311,7 +309,7 @@ static struct spi_driver adc108s102_driver = {
 	.driver = {
 		.name   = "adc108s102",
 		.of_match_table = adc108s102_of_match,
-		.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(adc108s102_acpi_ids),
+		.acpi_match_table = adc108s102_acpi_ids,
 	},
 	.probe		= adc108s102_probe,
 	.id_table	= adc108s102_id,
-- 
2.43.0