From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Cc: "Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Julien Stephan" <jstephan@baylibre.com>,
"Esteban Blanc" <eblanc@baylibre.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/4] iio: add support for multiple scan types per channel
Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 20:12:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240519201241.7c60abac@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240507-iio-add-support-for-multiple-scan-types-v1-3-95ac33ee51e9@baylibre.com>
On Tue, 7 May 2024 14:02:07 -0500
David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:
> This adds new fields to the iio_channel structure to support multiple
> scan types per channel. This is useful for devices that support multiple
> resolution modes or other modes that require different data formats of
> the raw data.
>
> To make use of this, drivers can still use the old scan_type field for
> the "default" scan type and use the new scan_type_ext field for any
> additional scan types.
Comment inline says that you should commit scan_type if scan_type_ext
is provided. That makes sense to me rather that a default no one reads.
The example that follows in patch 4 uses both the scan_type and
the scan_type_ext which is even more confusing.
> And they must implement the new callback
> get_current_scan_type() to return the current scan type based on the
> current state of the device.
>
> The buffer code is the only code in the IIO core code that is using the
> scan_type field. This patch updates the buffer code to use the new
> iio_channel_validate_scan_type() function to ensure it is returning the
> correct scan type for the current state of the device when reading the
> sysfs attributes. The buffer validation code is also update to validate
> any additional scan types that are set in the scan_type_ext field. Part
> of that code is refactored to a new function to avoid duplication.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/include/linux/iio/iio.h b/include/linux/iio/iio.h
> index 19de573a944a..66f0b4c68f53 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iio/iio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iio/iio.h
> @@ -205,6 +205,9 @@ struct iio_scan_type {
> * @scan_index: Monotonic index to give ordering in scans when read
> * from a buffer.
> * @scan_type: struct describing the scan type
> + * @ext_scan_type: Used in rare cases where there is more than one scan
> + * format for a channel. When this is used, omit scan_type.
Here is the disagreement with the patch description.
> + * @num_ext_scan_type: Number of elements in ext_scan_type.
> * @info_mask_separate: What information is to be exported that is specific to
> * this channel.
> * @info_mask_separate_available: What availability information is to be
> @@ -256,6 +259,8 @@ struct iio_chan_spec {
> unsigned long address;
> int scan_index;
> struct iio_scan_type scan_type;
> + const struct iio_scan_type *ext_scan_type;
> + unsigned int num_ext_scan_type;
Let's make it explicit that you can't do both.
union {
struct iio_scan_type scan_type;
struct {
const struct iio_scan_type *ext_scan_type;
unsigned int num_ext_scan_type;
};
};
should work for that I think.
However this is I think only used for validation. If that's the case
do we care about values not in use? Can we move the validation to
be runtime if the get_current_scan_type() callback is used.
> long info_mask_separate;
> long info_mask_separate_available;
> long info_mask_shared_by_type;
> @@ -435,6 +440,9 @@ struct iio_trigger; /* forward declaration */
> * for better event identification.
> * @validate_trigger: function to validate the trigger when the
> * current trigger gets changed.
> + * @get_current_scan_type: must be implemented by drivers that use ext_scan_type
> + * in the channel spec to return the currently active scan
> + * type based on the current state of the device.
> * @update_scan_mode: function to configure device and scan buffer when
> * channels have changed
> * @debugfs_reg_access: function to read or write register value of device
> @@ -519,6 +527,9 @@ struct iio_info {
>
> int (*validate_trigger)(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> struct iio_trigger *trig);
> + const struct iio_scan_type *(*get_current_scan_type)(
> + const struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + const struct iio_chan_spec *chan);
> int (*update_scan_mode)(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> const unsigned long *scan_mask);
> int (*debugfs_reg_access)(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> @@ -804,6 +815,28 @@ static inline bool iio_read_acpi_mount_matrix(struct device *dev,
> }
> #endif
>
> +/**
> + * iio_get_current_scan_type - Get the current scan type for a channel
> + * @indio_dev: the IIO device to get the scan type for
> + * @chan: the channel to get the scan type for
> + *
> + * Most devices only have one scan type per channel and can just access it
> + * directly without calling this function. Core IIO code and drivers that
> + * implement ext_scan_type in the channel spec should use this function to
> + * get the current scan type for a channel.
> + *
> + * Returns: the current scan type for the channel
> + */
> +static inline const struct iio_scan_type *iio_get_current_scan_type(
> + const struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + const struct iio_chan_spec *chan)
> +{
> + if (indio_dev->info->get_current_scan_type)
> + return indio_dev->info->get_current_scan_type(indio_dev, chan);
> +
> + return &chan->scan_type;
> +}
> +
> ssize_t iio_format_value(char *buf, unsigned int type, int size, int *vals);
>
> int iio_str_to_fixpoint(const char *str, int fract_mult, int *integer,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-19 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-07 19:02 [PATCH RFC 0/4] iio: add support for multiple scan types David Lechner
2024-05-07 19:02 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] iio: introduce struct iio_scan_type David Lechner
2024-05-07 19:02 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] iio: buffer: use struct iio_scan_type to simplify code David Lechner
2024-05-07 19:02 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] iio: add support for multiple scan types per channel David Lechner
2024-05-19 19:12 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-05-20 13:51 ` David Lechner
2024-05-20 16:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-24 15:56 ` David Lechner
2024-05-25 16:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-25 17:04 ` David Lechner
2024-05-26 12:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-26 13:53 ` David Lechner
2024-05-07 19:02 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] iio: adc: ad7380: add support for multiple scan type David Lechner
2024-05-08 11:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-08 17:21 ` David Lechner
2024-05-19 19:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-20 13:59 ` David Lechner
2024-05-19 19:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-21 9:18 ` [PATCH RFC 0/4] iio: add support for multiple scan types Nuno Sá
2024-05-25 16:19 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240519201241.7c60abac@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=eblanc@baylibre.com \
--cc=jstephan@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox