Linux IIO development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: bu27034: Add a read only HWARDWAREGAIN
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 18:50:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240615185036.7d1934c2@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5e88c7b7b0389c6c011f15e05e065791f7561cf5.1718013518.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com>

On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:01:40 +0300
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> wrote:

> The ROHM BU27034 light sensor has two data channels for measuring
> different frequencies of light. The result from these channels is
> combined into Lux value while the raw channel values are reported via
> intensity channels.
> 
> Both of the intensity channels have adjustable gain setting which
> impacts the scale of the raw channels. Eg, doubling the gain will double
> the values read from the raw channels, which halves the scale value. The
> integration time can also be set for the sensor. This does also have an
> impact to the scale of the intensity channels because increasing the
> integration time will also increase the values reported via the raw
> channels.
> 
> Impact of integration time to the scale and the fact that the scale value
> does not start from '1', can make it hard for a human reader to compute the
> gain values based on the scale.
> 
> Add read-only HARDWAREGAIN to help debugging.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Other than the thing the bot found with fallthrough on the switch statement
not being marked LGTM.
> ---
>  drivers/iio/light/rohm-bu27034.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/rohm-bu27034.c b/drivers/iio/light/rohm-bu27034.c
> index 51acad2cafbd..b299ff2aacce 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/light/rohm-bu27034.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/light/rohm-bu27034.c
> @@ -149,7 +149,8 @@ static const struct iio_itime_sel_mul bu27034_itimes[] = {
>  	.channel = BU27034_CHAN_##_name,				\
>  	.channel2 = IIO_MOD_LIGHT_CLEAR,				\
>  	.info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) |			\
> -			      BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),			\
> +			      BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE) |		\
> +			      BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_HARDWAREGAIN),		\
>  	.info_mask_separate_available = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),	\
>  	.info_mask_shared_by_all = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_INT_TIME),		\
>  	.info_mask_shared_by_all_available =				\
> @@ -992,6 +993,13 @@ static int bu27034_read_raw(struct iio_dev *idev,
>  
>  		return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
>  
> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_HARDWAREGAIN:
> +		ret = bu27034_get_gain(data, chan->channel, val);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		return IIO_VAL_INT;
> +
>  	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
>  		return bu27034_get_scale(data, chan->channel, val, val2);
>  
> @@ -1036,12 +1044,16 @@ static int bu27034_write_raw_get_fmt(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  				     struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
>  				     long mask)
>  {
> +	struct bu27034_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>  
>  	switch (mask) {
>  	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
>  		return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO;
>  	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_INT_TIME:
>  		return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_HARDWAREGAIN:
> +		dev_dbg(data->dev,
> +			"HARDWAREGAIN is read-only, use scale to set\n");

return -EINVAL here.  You could use a fall through marking but it gains
little so I wouldn't bother.

>  	default:
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-06-15 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-10 10:00 [PATCH 0/2] ROHM BU27034NUC to ROHM BU27034ANUC Matti Vaittinen
2024-06-10 10:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] bu27034: ROHM BU27034NUC to BU27034ANUC Matti Vaittinen
2024-06-15 17:47   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-17  6:07     ` Matti Vaittinen
2024-06-10 10:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] iio: bu27034: Add a read only HWARDWAREGAIN Matti Vaittinen
2024-06-10 12:55   ` kernel test robot
2024-06-10 13:28   ` kernel test robot
2024-06-15 17:50   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-06-17  5:34     ` Matti Vaittinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240615185036.7d1934c2@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com \
    --cc=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox