Linux IIO development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@disroot.org>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Denis Ciocca <denis.ciocca@st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: st_sensors: relax WhoAmI check in st_sensors_verify_id()
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 19:44:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240629194416.535953ff@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240625082800.62305-1-kauschluss@disroot.org>

On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:57:55 +0530
Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@disroot.org> wrote:

> Hard matching against the WhoAmI values isn't ideal for using devices
> which are compatible with existing ones. Instead of raising an error,
> issue a warning instead, thus allowing the driver to continue probing.
> 
> Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@disroot.org>
LGTM.  I've +CC'd a few more people who might take a look.

In meantime I'll queue it up.

Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for
0-day to take a look and see what we missed.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
> index c77d7bdcc121..c69399ac6657 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
> @@ -606,10 +606,9 @@ int st_sensors_verify_id(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>  		}
>  
>  		if (sdata->sensor_settings->wai != wai) {
> -			dev_err(&indio_dev->dev,
> +			dev_warn(&indio_dev->dev,
>  				"%s: WhoAmI mismatch (0x%x).\n",
>  				indio_dev->name, wai);
> -			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
>  	}
>  


      reply	other threads:[~2024-06-29 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-25  8:27 [PATCH] iio: st_sensors: relax WhoAmI check in st_sensors_verify_id() Kaustabh Chakraborty
2024-06-29 18:44 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240629194416.535953ff@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=denis.ciocca@st.com \
    --cc=kauschluss@disroot.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox