Linux IIO development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Matteo Martelli <matteomartelli3@gmail.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: fix scale application in iio_convert_raw_to_processed_unlocked
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 16:30:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240803163058.369cb426@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240730-iio-fix-scale-v1-1-6246638c8daa@gmail.com>

On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:11:53 +0200
Matteo Martelli <matteomartelli3@gmail.com> wrote:

> When the scale_type is IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO or IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO
> the scale passed as argument is only applied to the fractional part of
> the value. Fix it by also multiplying the integer part by the scale
> provided.
> 
> Fixes: 48e44ce0f881 ("iio:inkern: Add function to read the processed value")
> Signed-off-by: Matteo Martelli <matteomartelli3@gmail.com>
Ouch.  I only vaguely recall the history of this, but I suspect that
extra 'scale' was an after thought and we messed it up.

Anyhow, applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git and marked for
stable.

Jonathan

> ---
> I found out that after iio_hwmon switched to
> iio_read_channel_processed_scale() to convert the power channel value
> from milli-Watts to micro-Watts [1], lm-sensors started to show
> unexpected values for the power channel of the pac1921 iio driver I was
> testing. It looks the issue relies in the
> iio_convert_raw_to_processed_unlocked() function that only applies the
> given scale to the fractional part if the channel scale type is
> IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO or IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO.
> 
> For example with a raw power value of 71, a power scale type of
> IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO and power scale value of 9.775200000 (mW) the
> processed power value would be ~694 mW but when scaled to uW by the
> iio_hwmon calling iio_read_channel_processed_scale() with a scale of
> 1000, the processed power would wrongly result to ~55678 uW (~55mW) =
> 71*9 + 71*775200000*1000/1000000000. This because the scale of 1000 is
> only applied to the fractional part of the power value. Instead it
> should be 71*9*1000 + 71*775200000*1000/1000000000 = 694039 uW.
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hwmon/20240620212005.821805-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev/
> ---
>  drivers/iio/inkern.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/inkern.c b/drivers/iio/inkern.c
> index 9f484c94bc6e..151099be2863 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/inkern.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/inkern.c
> @@ -647,17 +647,17 @@ static int iio_convert_raw_to_processed_unlocked(struct iio_channel *chan,
>  		break;
>  	case IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO:
>  		if (scale_val2 < 0)
> -			*processed = -raw64 * scale_val;
> +			*processed = -raw64 * scale_val * scale;
>  		else
> -			*processed = raw64 * scale_val;
> +			*processed = raw64 * scale_val * scale;
>  		*processed += div_s64(raw64 * (s64)scale_val2 * scale,
>  				      1000000LL);
>  		break;
>  	case IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO:
>  		if (scale_val2 < 0)
> -			*processed = -raw64 * scale_val;
> +			*processed = -raw64 * scale_val * scale;
>  		else
> -			*processed = raw64 * scale_val;
> +			*processed = raw64 * scale_val * scale;
>  		*processed += div_s64(raw64 * (s64)scale_val2 * scale,
>  				      1000000000LL);
>  		break;
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 1ebab783647a9e3bf357002d5c4ff060c8474a0a
> change-id: 20240729-iio-fix-scale-287b7630374e
> 
> Best regards,


      reply	other threads:[~2024-08-03 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-30  8:11 [PATCH] iio: fix scale application in iio_convert_raw_to_processed_unlocked Matteo Martelli
2024-08-03 15:30 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240803163058.369cb426@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matteomartelli3@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox