From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@gmail.com>
Cc: inv.git-commit@tdk.com, lars@metafoo.de,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@tdk.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: add new interrupt handler for WoM events
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 17:53:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240806175324.3eea67c7@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0ea167a1-75d0-469d-a79f-ff2cb5e81bdc@gmail.com>
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 11:25:03 +0300
Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@gmail.com> wrote:
> 11.03.24 6:05 пп, inv.git-commit@tdk.com:
> > From: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@tdk.com>
> >
> > Add new interrupt handler for generating WoM event from int status register
> > bits. Launch from interrupt the trigger poll function for data buffer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@tdk.com>
Jean-Baptiste,
Please take a look at this report. I'd rather not revert the series
if we can figure out what is wrong and get a fix on top in reasonably
quickly.
I'd guess a power problem so we are getting interrupts when device is powered down?
Hence the reads fail.
Jonathan
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h | 2 +
> > drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c | 11 ---
> > drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_trigger.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++--
> > 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h
> > index d5b0465d1f74..ca5f7d45a6d4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h
> > @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ struct inv_mpu6050_hw {
> > * @magn_orient: magnetometer sensor chip orientation if available.
> > * @suspended_sensors: sensors mask of sensors turned off for suspend
> > * @data: read buffer used for bulk reads.
> > + * @it_timestamp: interrupt timestamp.
> > */
> > struct inv_mpu6050_state {
> > struct mutex lock;
> > @@ -210,6 +211,7 @@ struct inv_mpu6050_state {
> > unsigned int suspended_sensors;
> > bool level_shifter;
> > u8 *data;
> > + s64 it_timestamp;
> > };
> >
> > /*register and associated bit definition*/
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c
> > index 13da6f523ca2..e282378ee2ca 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c
> > @@ -51,21 +51,10 @@ irqreturn_t inv_mpu6050_read_fifo(int irq, void *p)
> > u32 fifo_period;
> > s64 timestamp;
> > u8 data[INV_MPU6050_OUTPUT_DATA_SIZE];
> > - int int_status;
> > size_t i, nb;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> >
> > - /* ack interrupt and check status */
> > - result = regmap_read(st->map, st->reg->int_status, &int_status);
> > - if (result) {
> > - dev_err(regmap_get_device(st->map),
> > - "failed to ack interrupt\n");
> > - goto flush_fifo;
> > - }
> > - if (!(int_status & INV_MPU6050_BIT_RAW_DATA_RDY_INT))
> > - goto end_session;
> > -
> > if (!(st->chip_config.accl_fifo_enable |
> > st->chip_config.gyro_fifo_enable |
> > st->chip_config.magn_fifo_enable))
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_trigger.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_trigger.c
> > index ec2398a87f45..2514966f6495 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_trigger.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_trigger.c
> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> >
> > #include <linux/iio/common/inv_sensors_timestamp.h>
> > +#include <linux/iio/events.h>
> >
> > #include "inv_mpu_iio.h"
> >
> > @@ -223,6 +224,65 @@ static const struct iio_trigger_ops inv_mpu_trigger_ops = {
> > .set_trigger_state = &inv_mpu_data_rdy_trigger_set_state,
> > };
> >
> > +static irqreturn_t inv_mpu6050_interrupt_timestamp(int irq, void *p)
> > +{
> > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = p;
> > + struct inv_mpu6050_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > +
> > + st->it_timestamp = iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev);
> > +
> > + return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static irqreturn_t inv_mpu6050_interrupt_handle(int irq, void *p)
> > +{
> > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = p;
> > + struct inv_mpu6050_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > + unsigned int int_status, wom_bits;
> > + u64 ev_code;
> > + int result;
> > +
> > + switch (st->chip_type) {
> > + case INV_MPU6050:
> > + case INV_MPU6500:
> > + case INV_MPU6515:
> > + case INV_MPU6880:
> > + case INV_MPU6000:
> > + case INV_MPU9150:
> > + case INV_MPU9250:
> > + case INV_MPU9255:
> > + wom_bits = INV_MPU6500_BIT_WOM_INT;
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + wom_bits = INV_ICM20608_BIT_WOM_INT;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + scoped_guard(mutex, &st->lock) {
> > + /* ack interrupt and check status */
> > + result = regmap_read(st->map, st->reg->int_status, &int_status);
> > + if (result) {
> > + dev_err(regmap_get_device(st->map), "failed to ack interrupt\n");
> > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* handle WoM event */
> > + if (st->chip_config.wom_en && (int_status & wom_bits)) {
> > + ev_code = IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL, 0, IIO_MOD_X_OR_Y_OR_Z,
> > + IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC, IIO_EV_DIR_RISING);
> > + iio_push_event(indio_dev, ev_code, st->it_timestamp);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* handle raw data interrupt */
> > + if (int_status & INV_MPU6050_BIT_RAW_DATA_RDY_INT) {
> > + indio_dev->pollfunc->timestamp = st->it_timestamp;
> > + iio_trigger_poll_nested(st->trig);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> > int inv_mpu6050_probe_trigger(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int irq_type)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > @@ -235,11 +295,10 @@ int inv_mpu6050_probe_trigger(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int irq_type)
> > if (!st->trig)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > - ret = devm_request_irq(&indio_dev->dev, st->irq,
> > - &iio_trigger_generic_data_rdy_poll,
> > - irq_type,
> > - "inv_mpu",
> > - st->trig);
> > + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&indio_dev->dev, st->irq,
> > + &inv_mpu6050_interrupt_timestamp,
> > + &inv_mpu6050_interrupt_handle,
> > + irq_type, "inv_mpu", indio_dev);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
>
> Greetings!
>
> After this patch was applied to Linux kernel I faced a regression on my
> devices LG P895/P880.
>
> Dmesg is flooded with
>
> [ 50.035018] inv-mpu6050-i2c 0-0068: failed to ack interrupt -121
>
> and mpu6050 used on this device refuses to work. It did not occur before
> WoM patches were
>
> applied and reverting patches restores normal work of mpu6050.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Svyatoslav R.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-06 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-11 16:05 [PATCH v3 0/4] Add WoM feature as an IIO event inv.git-commit
2024-03-11 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: add WoM (Wake-on-Motion) sensor inv.git-commit
2024-03-11 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: add WoM event as accel event inv.git-commit
2024-03-11 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: add new interrupt handler for WoM events inv.git-commit
2024-07-23 8:25 ` Svyatoslav Ryhel
2024-08-06 16:53 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-08-07 15:48 ` Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol
2024-08-07 16:03 ` Svyatoslav Ryhel
2024-08-07 16:18 ` Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol
2024-08-07 16:48 ` Svyatoslav Ryhel
2024-08-13 16:06 ` Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol
2024-08-13 16:09 ` Svyatoslav Ryhel
2024-08-14 14:39 ` Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol
2024-08-14 15:53 ` Svyatoslav Ryhel
2024-03-11 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: add WoM suspend wakeup with low-power mode inv.git-commit
2024-03-16 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Add WoM feature as an IIO event Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240806175324.3eea67c7@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=clamor95@gmail.com \
--cc=inv.git-commit@tdk.com \
--cc=jean-baptiste.maneyrol@tdk.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox