From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 578A319CC03 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 18:18:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725301115; cv=none; b=doPyG/nKe4QGS1Yq6aAei9AMQ+2VD8emiaAgYieCv2DL9oy1LmOu2iUuPRjMxSiHgkxOHXqGhweUhO01DBFLIVVTVHXNB+zqiSP2PbB+THnKI1Y/yRm/FhvjPCjkAIcydiOrzTi637nzNiUnDYBgZKza9VPmJK3kGTuvXCAH+k8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725301115; c=relaxed/simple; bh=imfPzVFkPXFH0QJ0gEqF7JpauP2N09UqYXniMVOEA74=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DKihiJtwM2Dn8zrNIMHytI2S/v+LjN4+DXEaDQxlWXN/H5mrJN1aPQsVqNNvFopwp0eW4nlaqNepPZYQac0OLJ2SQDYTdb5WuVwCdz4EEn59SKwue+tlKASyeTyb9YrrxeJOAITBUR22evLmuM7PbsDsgfwsaBHTFmc9nKznpJo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=rh7TSyaM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="rh7TSyaM" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20D34C4CEC2; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 18:18:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1725301114; bh=imfPzVFkPXFH0QJ0gEqF7JpauP2N09UqYXniMVOEA74=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rh7TSyaMiwcrXgnHWrzA9loo5hvsuuX+6Ois/pU6ruqTI9rre3yv9+e1efVAv8cyE 0BdC6tknbDbA3dMeACVMrZ1lRKL3wNZyIL4+qsIFK3/BJX0yRfJFvfcH385/r2K4T3 3hUsJnl0Sd+UD/P7e9DiaRfY+PPB9/vtVBQFBRfVF0fHYMN6ruOzyYqcdLKymqI3+k p3sZRNEjRqcBRyFfeaKLKPnjU8YNIvNZ7pCVonQY724/s4VMVv02tAtOkytBiIdU7s iTm2iJ2TGpwJDlCzIdlfHZdTfWSORIW4E0a2vKWCX1G/HXAYk9dMtwsg2DnxtGTno0 Xw1PyO+Lu2iJw== Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 19:18:29 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol , linux-iio Subject: Re: Revert patch 1908f13c4682 ("iio: imu: inv_mpu6060: Remove duplicata code between labels") Message-ID: <20240902191829.73b080cd@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: <20240902113619.00005b83@Huawei.com> References: <20240902113619.00005b83@Huawei.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.43; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2 Sep 2024 11:36:19 +0100 Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Mon, 2 Sep 2024 10:19:52 +0000 > Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol wrote: > > > Hello Jonathan, > > > > accepted patch 1908f13c4682 ("iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: Remove duplicata code between labels") is breaking inv_mpu6050 interrupt handling, forcing call of inv_reset_fifo() for each interrupt processing. > > > > Can you revert it inside testing branch? Is there a specific standardize way of asking to revert patch or is it OK like this? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Best regards, > > JB > > > > This is fine. I'll do it when on right machine later today. > > Jonathan > Done. J