Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: imu: mpu6050: Add iam20680ht/hp bindings to mpu6050

Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol
2024-09-20T13:35:06Z

Hello,

sorry, my mistake.

I'm resending it to the right lists and persons.

Sorry for the inconvenient.

Thanks,
JB

________________________________________
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2024 13:19
To: INV Git Commit <INV.git-commit@tdk.com>; jic23@kernel.org <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: lars@metafoo.de <lars@metafoo.de>; linux-iio@vger.kernel.org <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>; Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <Jean-Baptiste.Maneyrol@tdk.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: imu: mpu6050: Add iam20680ht/hp bindings to mpu6050

This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.

On 19/09/2024 16:27, inv.git-commit@tdk.com wrote:
> From: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@tdk.com>

Sender does not match SoB... Maybe you need to use use b4 relay.


Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.

Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
(don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
patches to the patchset.

You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
a waste of time.

Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.


Best regards,
Krzysztof