linux-iio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com>,
	lars@metafoo.de, andy.shevchenko@gmail.com,
	u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 2/2] iio: light: rpr0521: Drop unnecessary checks for timestamp value
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:33:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240929103344.GA92011@vamoiridPC> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240928161527.73fe0ac1@jic23-huawei>

On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 04:15:27PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 18:20:41 +0200
> Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > The rpr0521_trigger_consumer_handler() is registered as the trigger
> > threaded handler in the devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup() function.
> > This function is being called in 2 ways:
> > 
> > a) when there is a registered trigger being trigger like sysfs or hrt.
> > The call of the trigger handler (which is the iio_pollfunc_store_time())
> > follows which saves the timestamp and then, wakes up the trigger
> > threaded handler.
> > 
> > b) The irq handler is using the iio_trigger_poll_nested() which wakes
> > up the trigger threaded handler.
> > 
> > In both cases, the pf->timestamp has already been assigned a value
> > so there is no need to check if it is 0, neither to 0 it after
> > the push to the buffer.
> 
> Not quite right (I think).  The caller of iio_trigger_poll_nested() might not
> be this driver.  There are other potential triggers that are nested
> because of need to check some status register, but can still be used
> for other devices.   In theory you could drive light capture of
> the as3935 for when you want to know how bright it was just after
> a lightening strike :)
> 
> We don't have a general solution for timestamps when that
> happens, so this driver is papering over that with this code.
> 
> 
> Jonathan
> 

Hi Jonathan,

Thank you very much for the reply! I see your point, I also think I 
am wrong after all. I was just interested to see why this driver makes
it so different from the other ones when it is coming to trigger/irq
handling. Thank you very much for the explanation!

Cheers,
Vasilis

> 
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/light/rpr0521.c | 8 +-------
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/rpr0521.c b/drivers/iio/light/rpr0521.c
> > index 56f5fbbf79ac..ae6a22b91b8d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/light/rpr0521.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/light/rpr0521.c
> > @@ -446,13 +446,8 @@ static irqreturn_t rpr0521_trigger_consumer_handler(int irq, void *p)
> >  	int err;
> >  
> >  	/* Use irq timestamp when reasonable. */
> > -	if (iio_trigger_using_own(indio_dev) && data->irq_timestamp) {
> > +	if (iio_trigger_using_own(indio_dev))
> >  		pf->timestamp = data->irq_timestamp;
> > -		data->irq_timestamp = 0;
> > -	}
> > -	/* Other chained trigger polls get timestamp only here. */
> > -	if (!pf->timestamp)
> > -		pf->timestamp = iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev);
> >  
> >  	err = regmap_bulk_read(data->regmap, RPR0521_REG_PXS_DATA,
> >  		data->scan.channels,
> > @@ -463,7 +458,6 @@ static irqreturn_t rpr0521_trigger_consumer_handler(int irq, void *p)
> >  	else
> >  		dev_err(&data->client->dev,
> >  			"Trigger consumer can't read from sensor.\n");
> > -	pf->timestamp = 0;
> >  
> >  	iio_trigger_notify_done(indio_dev->trig);
> >  
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2024-09-29 10:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-22 16:20 [PATCH RFC v1 0/2] iio: Simplify IRQ and trigger management in RPR0521 Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-09-22 16:20 ` [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] iio: light: rpr0521: Use generic iio_pollfunc_store_time() Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-09-28 15:10   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-12 16:12     ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-22 16:20 ` [PATCH RFC v1 2/2] iio: light: rpr0521: Drop unnecessary checks for timestamp value Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-09-28 15:15   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-29 10:33     ` Vasileios Amoiridis [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240929103344.GA92011@vamoiridPC \
    --to=vassilisamir@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).