From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: hid-sensors: Fix an error handling path in _hid_sensor_set_report_latency()
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 19:06:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241005190620.5f8633a9@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c50640665f091a04086e5092cf50f73f2055107a.1727980825.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 20:41:12 +0200
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> If hid_sensor_set_report_latency() fails, the error code should be returned
> instead of a value likely to be interpreted as 'success'.
>
> Fixes: 138bc7969c24 ("iio: hid-sensor-hub: Implement batch mode")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> ---
> This patch is speculative.
>
> The code just *looks* wrong to me. No strong opinion, if it is done on
> purpose or not.
Agreed it smells :) But I'd like more eyes on this before I take the fix
as maybe there is something subtle going on.
J
> ---
> drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-trigger.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-trigger.c b/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-trigger.c
> index ad8910e6ad59..abb09fefc792 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-trigger.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-trigger.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static ssize_t _hid_sensor_set_report_latency(struct device *dev,
> latency = integer * 1000 + fract / 1000;
> ret = hid_sensor_set_report_latency(attrb, latency);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return len;
> + return ret;
>
> attrb->latency_ms = hid_sensor_get_report_latency(attrb);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-05 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-03 18:41 [PATCH] iio: hid-sensors: Fix an error handling path in _hid_sensor_set_report_latency() Christophe JAILLET
2024-10-05 18:06 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-10-08 17:21 ` srinivas pandruvada
2024-10-10 17:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241005190620.5f8633a9@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox