From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A0001EF941 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 18:33:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729535580; cv=none; b=bfFqhggeyaC0HzsvGk1ZjR4Y2B7gJNEP+sdk9i+Cx9AQJwb3zDDjiQzuB6s4fvjBKd29uJWh1d8ThQvyFe2El033gzp/r0/qGipIAkS2qc51rw7stv+rG6Opx1DU9iHFP0IKPhwsIMSydBGdizgeU5l/F+W/yA6K/5SK7/d4E5s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729535580; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xvA4avjANey+0vEHMf7eD4Rioj05sFnrEhAP0yzYz0M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ch3NWkr5Cki1gQ4Gh8yC+bejeTdD46ilLDMFsdHyDCrGLntIAr3Wpd+UV7FohIfq3YB3vD4KfZt0v/FIWZ9xhMK+Htj7VP1bYg/BM/fjLMQdcibQVY1aFd6jpWEma8Si52fjBTV8mTh6EjFt/TeRpbldd/XFeizxC0y6aSQ+82Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=chQWSQK0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="chQWSQK0" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E45CC4CEC3; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 18:32:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1729535579; bh=xvA4avjANey+0vEHMf7eD4Rioj05sFnrEhAP0yzYz0M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=chQWSQK0IhvpKyJbuVJjiWYm1tAafkqVkVAZ4WYqOTmIOozPaVnHhN6MVeQRAFaNX CJrShY9UjKV72Vv9GYObkfyWMIxan5OG/++4RRFO+ILSpOoKuGd1L4y3LPvPWsAR/M Tjh6wb30sBMXbBNep688wS1yY6qK7giApV2qPxQ9iucYUvM4rg8TB1rflL2UY1fAj7 OyVtyulo9+5wsG+WmDfWHp5iyEv+D4dzXewTgon8PgN99amekeZE3+9uKKfW9jgI8p GBMMcak7zabcNB1/xNyP2KIX3N9mnn+aaDMyONQHZjqQXBD91zpGKwpxqF+/jcHPCL 3XKkkBpggLU4A== Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 19:32:54 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: accel: replace s64 __aligned(8) with aligned_s64 Message-ID: <20241021193254.61ea9048@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: References: <20241020180720.496327-1-jic23@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.43; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 10:10:25 +0300 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 07:07:20PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > From: Jonathan Cameron > > > > e4ca0e59c394 ("types: Complement the aligned types with signed 64-bit one") > > introduced aligned_s64. Use it for all IIO accelerometer drivers. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron > > > > --- > > > > I debated whether to split this up by driver by the time we've done all IIO > > drivers that will be a very large number of trivial patches. > > > > The changes are minor enough that they shouldn't present much of a > > backporting challenge if needed for future fixes etc. > > > > I'm find splitting them up if people prefer. > > Next on my list is to look at adding runtime checks that the buffers > > containing these timestamps are big enough but I want this out of the > > way first. > > I agree on all your points. > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko > Applied given it's so trivial and 3 people already reviewed! Thanks, Jonathan