From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7443B24C089; Wed, 5 Mar 2025 14:24:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741184650; cv=none; b=PcbwQ4mZ+FXnjAXurFgKfdPPkSu4+dMedgKSQb6b7qPUVXTvGen4mbjh2X8RRNJjY9dc7Ji239+/orXO38DwIYXNEx5vX8Y2I+1wOfiBWj2nSrFHIlKy/fxjYXIaDvfG3oJeYphy8EX8JhUugrOX8IJssW2ViuyiDaNFrm0PAXI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741184650; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qjIFghAqzxSp38ILvzrPxKS9tuDCzOwCSDS2Csdt7wI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=enAhVSQ1PLkOO05iqa3Raj2ARFztUXngqizRAVrFiu6Df5pq1Qtt7Y5kZcVO/QiPpRJnNlBhM0gBgqGY7HO3D3vA09EpOvPFJxD1rZ9Uh5j8tL0GJ/gNoT8GzVyMG1+Jd7UwEjlvGuEFIFUSBxGezqVmcTMDnj0+3c4tNgwFNv8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Lz4JNaPJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Lz4JNaPJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2496FC4CED1; Wed, 5 Mar 2025 14:24:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1741184649; bh=qjIFghAqzxSp38ILvzrPxKS9tuDCzOwCSDS2Csdt7wI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Lz4JNaPJkppbPkN8SgD6IyMXsgyVB1EjCyxqwpgKh5rFtWv+ek95I5nQFyMTCelPT 2fws/6oRqsrkzCSBsq6HhdDJeBO2qQi1BHBuh7KOJCWU+43edpWBhc+Lm1UWrLJ1Di Po/4UOldqF5cxqE8pogFIFsawg806zjjNqSKCJRrSappM/JzXRXz3kEzD2fPRbyCPh s+oT2XIRSkbnLwlBS6IRvMrv/By8xEHaaen8oycddqSFaiYLKCfz5wB+rUJUTS1dXu PDg8TvWMSRjJjUWFxDps5uUXP7xC1PURzRAXRCNYi4rh0e5dUGJAD3of6kmeIPqucO UYWJbU2I1UQ7Q== Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 14:23:58 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Sam Winchenbach Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, antoniu.miclaus@analog.com, lars@metafoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: filter: admv8818: fix range calculation Message-ID: <20250305142358.6c916e7c@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: References: <20250304233411.3fac7c69@jic23-huawei> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.48; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 08:11:17 -0500 Sam Winchenbach wrote: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 11:34:11PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:17:11 -0500 > > Sam Winchenbach wrote: > > > > > Corrects the upper range of LPF Band 4 from 18.5 GHz to 18.85 GHz per > > > the ADMV8818 datasheet > > > > > Hi Sam, > > > > Just a trivial process thing. If you are sending updated code > > and there isn't an obvious reason why when someone looks at the > > old patch set (e.g. no reviews asking for changes etc) please > > reply to that. > > > > At times where reviewers (such as me on this occasion) are running > > way behind they might look at wrong version otherwise. > > > > Jonathan > > Hi Jonathan, > > Just to clarify, if I update the patches in, for example v2, then I should > reply to the v2 email with the new patch set? > > That makes sense... it looks like I can use: "--in-reply-to=" with > git send-email. No, not that! That needs to nested mess in complex threads. A simple reply from an email client to say that you are revisting for 'x' reason is fine and that you either have or are about to post v3. Thanks, Jonathan > > Sorry for any confusion this may have caused. > > Thanks, > -Sam